Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial

Radhika Nair, Nishita Singh, Mahesh Kate, Negar Asdaghi, Robert Sarmiento, Fouzi Bala, Shelagh B Coutts, MacKenzie Horn, Alexandre Y Poppe, Heather Williams, Ayoola Ademola, Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Houman Khosravani, Gary Hunter, Aleksander Tkach, Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate, Aleksandra Pikula, Thalia Field, Anurag Trivedi, Dar Dowlatshahi, Luciana Catanese, Ashfaq Shuaib, Andrew Demchuk, Tolulope Sajobi, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Richard H Swartz, Bijoy Menon, Brian H Buck
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002828 Published 30 December 2024
Radhika Nair
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nishita Singh
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahesh Kate
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mahesh Kate
Negar Asdaghi
4 Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Sarmiento
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fouzi Bala
5 Department of Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
6 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fouzi Bala
Shelagh B Coutts
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MacKenzie Horn
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for MacKenzie Horn
Alexandre Y Poppe
7 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Williams
8 Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Health Sciences Centre, Charlottetown, Edward Island, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayoola Ademola
9 Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibrahim Alhabli
5 Department of Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faysal Benali
5 Department of Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Houman Khosravani
10 Department of Medicne, Neurology Division, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Hunter
11 Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aleksander Tkach
12 Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate
13 Department of Medicine, Medicine Hat Regional Hospital, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate
Aleksandra Pikula
14 Department of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thalia Field
15 Department of Neurosciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thalia Field
Anurag Trivedi
16 Department of Medicine, Neurology Division, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dar Dowlatshahi
17 Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dar Dowlatshahi
Luciana Catanese
18 Division of Neurology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashfaq Shuaib
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ashfaq Shuaib
Andrew Demchuk
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tolulope Sajobi
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed A Almekhlafi
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard H Swartz
19 Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bijoy Menon
3 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian H Buck
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brian H Buck
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90–120 days in the intention-to-treat population. mRS scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no symptoms, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability and 6 death.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Forest plot of the adjusted risk ratios for mRS 0–1 at 90–120 days stratified by clinically relevant subgroups. Models were adjusted for age, sex and occlusion location as fixed-effects variables, and site as a random-effects variable. P values for interactions were not significant for all subgroups (p<0.05). *There were no patients with intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions in the alteplase group. ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score; LVO, large vessel occlusion; M1-MCA, first segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2-MCA, second segment of the middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of study participants with minor stroke (NIHSS <6) treated with tenecteplase and alteplase

    Baseline characteristicTenecteplase (N=194)Alteplase (N=184)
    Age, median (IQR), years72 (62–83)71 (59–81)
    Female sex, N (%)75 (38.7)75 (40.8)
    Baseline NIHSS, median (IQR)4 (3–5)4 (3–5)
    Baseline ASPECTS score (n=143)†, median (IQR)9 (9–10)9 (9–10)
    Intracranial occlusion site on baseline CT angiography (n=376)*
     Internal carotid artery (ICA), N (%)3 (1.5)0 (0)
     M1 segment middle cerebral artery (MCA), N (%)9 (4.7)6 (3.3)
     M2 segment MCA, N (%)42 (21.8)17 (9.3)
     Other distal occlusions (MCA, ACA, PCA)‡, N (%)43 (22.3)41 (22.4)
     Vertebrobasilar arterial system, N (%)11 (5.7)14 (7.6)
     Cervical ICA, N (%)3 (1.5)3 (1.6)
     No visible occlusions, N (%)82 (42.5)102 (55.7)
    Presence of large vessel occlusion on baseline CT angiography, N (%)13 (6.7)6 (3.3)
    Type of enrolling centre
     Primary stroke centre, N (%)14 (7.2)8 (4.3)
     Comprehensive stroke centre, N (%)180 (92.8)176 (95.6)
    Workflow times, median (IQR), min
     Stroke symptom onset to randomisation, min146 (100–212)149 (106–205)
     Stroke symptom onset to start of thrombolysis, min150 (106–218)159 (111–214)
     Baseline CT to arterial puncture (in patients undergoing EVT), min78 (58–188)95 (51–216)
     Arterial puncture to successful reperfusion (in patients undergoing EVT), min33 (18–41)21 (13–25)
    • Data are n (%), n/N (%) or median (IQR). Large vessel occlusion is defined as large vessel occlusion of the ICA, M1 segment MCA or functional M1 segment MCA occlusion, that is, all M2 segments MCA occluded on baseline CT angiography scan. If patients had more than one occlusion site, the most proximal occlusion is listed.

    • *Two patients had baseline non-contrast CT but did not have a baseline CT angiography.

    • †ASPECTS was available for patients who had ICA or MCA occlusion at baseline.

    • ‡MCA (M3 and beyond), ACA (A2 and beyond) or PCA (P2 and beyond).

    • ACA, anterior cerebral artery; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; EVT, endovascular thrombectomy; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PCA, posterior cerebral artery.

  • Table 2

    Primary and secondary outcomes at 90–120 days for study participants treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase

    Tenecteplase (n=194)Alteplase (n=184)Unadjusted risk ratio (95% CI)Adjusted risk ratio (95% CI)*
    Primary outcome
     Modified Rankin Scale score 0–1 at 90–120 days, n (%)100 (51.8)86 (47.5)1.09 (0.88 to 1.23)1.14 (0.92 to 1.40)
    Secondary outcomes
     Modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 at 90–120 days, n (%)143 (74.1)126 (69.6)1.06 (0.93 to 1.20)1.09 (0.94 to 1.26)
     Modified Rankin Scale score at 90–120 days, median (IQR)1 (0–3)2 (1–3)0.74 (0.52 to 1.07)0.69 (0.47 to 1.00)†
     EQ-5D VAS at 90–120 days, median (IQR)75 (61–86)75 (60–90)0.62 (-3.50 to 4.77)0.99 (0.97-1.02)‡
     Return to baseline function, n (%)80 (42.5)61 (35.3)1.20 (0.92 to 1.56)1.20 (0.90 to 1.59)
     Endovascular thrombectomy utilisation, n (%)22 (11.3)15 (8.1)1.39 (0.74 to 2.59)0.88 (0.53 to 1.47)
     eTICI 2b/3 at first angiographic run, n (%)8 (36.4)1 (6.7)5.45 (0.75 to 39.21)6.68 (0.49 to 90.57)
     eTICI 2b/3 at final angiographic run, n (%)9 (60)21 (95.4)1.59 (1.04 to 2.42)1.57 (0.58 to 4.25)
     Length of hospital stay, median days (IQR)4 (2–8)4 (2–7)−0.47 (−2.6 to 1.70)0.86 (0.79 to 0.93)‡
    • Data are n (%), median (IQR), mean (SD) or effect estimate with 95% CI in parentheses.

    • *Adjusted for age, sex, occlusion location as fixed-effects variables and participating site as a random-effects variable.

    • †Common OR is the OR for a unit increase in the modified Rankin Scale score for tenecteplase versus alteplase.

    • ‡Risk ratio using mixed-effects linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, occlusion location as fixed-effects variables and participating site as a random-effects variable.

    • eTICI, expanded treatment in cerebral infarction; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.

  • Table 3

    Safety outcomes in study participants treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase

    EndpointsTenecteplase (n=194), n (%)Alteplase (n=184), n (%)Unadjusted risk ratio (95% CI)
    Death within 90 days11 (5.7)20 (11.0)0.99 (0.96 to 1.02)*
    Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage5 (2.6)6 (3.3)0.79 (0.24 to 2.54)
    Peripheral bleeding requiring blood transfusions0 (0)0 (0)NA
    Orolingual angioedema1 (0.5)1 (0.5)0.94 (0.06 to 15.05)
    Other17 (8.8)17 (9.2)0.94 (0.49 to 1.80)
    Imaging-identified haemorrhage23 (11.9)27 (14.7)0.80 (0.48 to 1.35)
    Subarachnoid haemorrhage5 (2.6)4 (2.2)1.18 (0.32 to 4.34)
    Subdural haemorrhage0 (0)1 (0.5)NA
    Intraventricular haemorrhage5 (2.6)3 (1.6)1.58 (0.38 to 6.52)
    HI1 (scattered small petechiae)1 (0.5)5 (2.7)0.18 (0.02 to 1.59)
    HI2 (confluent petechiae)12 (6.2)13 (7.1)0.86 (0.40 to 1.84)
    PH1 (haematoma occupying <30% of infarct with no substantive mass effect)†6 (3.1)3 (1.6)1.87 (0.47 to 7.39)
    PH2 (haematoma occupying ≥30% of infarct with obvious mass effect)‡2 (1)3 (1.6)0.62 (0.10 to 3.70)
    • Imaging-identified intracranial haemorrhages were assessed in a central core laboratory in a blinded manner and classified using the Heidelberg classification.

    • *HR using Cox proportional hazard adjusted for age, sex and occlusion site.

    • †Remote PH type 1 was defined as haematoma outside the infarcted tissue with no substantive mass effect.

    • ‡Remote PH type 2 was defined as haematoma outside the infarcted tissue, with obvious mass effect.

    • HI, haemorrhagic infarction; NA, not applicable; PH, parenchymal haematoma.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2023-002828supp001.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2023-002828supp002.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
    • Data supplement 2
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 6 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 9 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial
Radhika Nair, Nishita Singh, Mahesh Kate, Negar Asdaghi, Robert Sarmiento, Fouzi Bala, Shelagh B Coutts, MacKenzie Horn, Alexandre Y Poppe, Heather Williams, Ayoola Ademola, Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Houman Khosravani, Gary Hunter, Aleksander Tkach, Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate, Aleksandra Pikula, Thalia Field, Anurag Trivedi, Dar Dowlatshahi, Luciana Catanese, Ashfaq Shuaib, Andrew Demchuk, Tolulope Sajobi, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Richard H Swartz, Bijoy Menon, Brian H Buck
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 604-612; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002828

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial
Radhika Nair, Nishita Singh, Mahesh Kate, Negar Asdaghi, Robert Sarmiento, Fouzi Bala, Shelagh B Coutts, MacKenzie Horn, Alexandre Y Poppe, Heather Williams, Ayoola Ademola, Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Houman Khosravani, Gary Hunter, Aleksander Tkach, Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate, Aleksandra Pikula, Thalia Field, Anurag Trivedi, Dar Dowlatshahi, Luciana Catanese, Ashfaq Shuaib, Andrew Demchuk, Tolulope Sajobi, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Richard H Swartz, Bijoy Menon, Brian H Buck
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 604-612; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002828
Download PDF

Share
Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for minor ischaemic stroke: a secondary analysis of the AcT randomised clinical trial
Radhika Nair, Nishita Singh, Mahesh Kate, Negar Asdaghi, Robert Sarmiento, Fouzi Bala, Shelagh B Coutts, MacKenzie Horn, Alexandre Y Poppe, Heather Williams, Ayoola Ademola, Ibrahim Alhabli, Faysal Benali, Houman Khosravani, Gary Hunter, Aleksander Tkach, Herbert Alejandro Manosalva Alzate, Aleksandra Pikula, Thalia Field, Anurag Trivedi, Dar Dowlatshahi, Luciana Catanese, Ashfaq Shuaib, Andrew Demchuk, Tolulope Sajobi, Mohammed A Almekhlafi, Richard H Swartz, Bijoy Menon, Brian H Buck
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 604-612; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002828
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association