Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Association between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with different lesion patterns in patients with intravenous thrombolysis

Erling Wang, Chuanjie Wu, Dandan Yang, Xihai Zhao, Jie Zhao, Hong Chang, Qi Yang
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000641 Published 16 February 2021
Erling Wang
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chuanjie Wu
2Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dandan Yang
3Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dandan Yang
Xihai Zhao
4Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xihai Zhao
Jie Zhao
2Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Chang
2Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qi Yang
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
5Key Laboratory of Medical Engineering for Cardiovascular Disease, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qi Yang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Illustrative cases according to the DWI lesion patterns. Case A (BZ group) shows severe stenosis of left MCA on CTA, a border-zone infarct lesion on DWI and with FVH positive in FLAIR; FVHs located beyond the lesions. Case B (ML group) shows occlusion of the right MCA, two lesions in different artery territories on DWI and with FVH positive on FLAIR; FVHs located beyond the lesions. Case C (LT group) shows occlusion of the left MCA on CTA, a large territory infarct lesion on DWI and with FVH positive on FLAIR; FVHs located within or very closed to the lesions. Case D (SL group) shows near occlusion of the left MCA on CTA, a lesion in the basal ganglia on DWI and with FVH positive on FLAIR; FVHs located beyond the lesions. BZ group, border-zone infarct group; CTA, CT angiography; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; FVH, FLAIR vascular hyperintensity; LT group, large territory infarct group; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ML group, multiple lesion infarcts group; SL group, single cortical or subcortical lesion group.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    The flow chart of patients included. BZ group, border-zone infarct group; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; LT group, large territory infarct group; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ML group, multiple lesion infarcts group; r-tPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; SL group, single cortical or subcortical lesion group.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Clinical and demographic characteristics of FVH (+) and FVH (−) patients in all patients and four subgroups

    All patientsBZ groupML groupLT groupSL group
    FVH−FVH+P valueFVH−FVH+P valueFVH−FVH+P valueFVH−FVH+P valueFVH−FVH+P value
    N=103 (%)N=100 (%)N=43 (%)N=29 (%)N=25 (%)N=39 (%)N=11 (%)N=26 (%)N=24 (%)N=6 (%)
    Sex (men)82 (79.6)87 (87.0)0.15935 (81.4)25 (86.2)0.83021 (84.0)33 (84.6)0.9999 (81.8)23 (88.5)0.98917 (70.8)6 (100)0.331
    Age63.2±10.163.4±10.40.87064.7±9.463.6±10.10.63462.7±9.563.3±10.20.82666.6±12.762.9±11.60.39559.3±10.165.7±9.80.174
    Hypertension81 (78.6)72 (72)0.27234 (79.1)19 (65.5)0.20120 (80.0)28 (71.8)0.4607 (63.6)21 (80.8)0.49020 (83.3)4 (66.7)0.732
    Diabetes mellitus34 (33.0)36 (36.0)0.65417 (39.5)12 (41.4)0.8766 (24.0)11 (28.2)0.7102 (18.2)10 (38.5)0.4129 (37.5)3 (50.0)0.926
    Coronary heart disease14 (13.6)19 (19.0)0.2966 (14.0)6 (20.7)0.6672 (8.0)7 (17.9)0.4543 (27.3)6 (23.1)0.9993 (12.5)0 (0)0.999
    Hyperlipidaemia55 (53.4)42 (42.0)0.10425 (58.1)15 (51.7)0.59114 (56.0)17 (43.6)0.3324 (36.4)9 (34.6)0.99912 (50.0)1 (16.7)0.311
    Previous stroke29 (28.2)25 (25.0)0.61111 (25.6)8 (27.6)0.85010 (40.0)7 (17.9)0.0513 (27.3)5 (19.2)0.9155 (20.8)5 (83.3)0.015*
    Smoking58 (56.3)62 (62.0)0.41024 (55.8)17 (58.6)0.81415 (60.0)23 (59.0)0.9358 (72.7)19 (73.1)0.99911 (45.8)3 (50.0)0.999
    Drinking57 (55.3)54 (54.0)0.84824 (55.8)15 (51.7)0.73313 (52.0)25 (64.1)0.3367 (63.6)13 (50.0)0.44713 (54.2)1 (16.7)0.234
    Lacunar infarct56 (54.4)62 (62.0)0.27123 (53.5)18 (62.1)0.47116 (64.0)26 (66.7)0.8274 (36.4)15 (57.7)0.23513 (54.2)3 (50.0)0.999
    Occlusion11 (10.7)58 (58.0)<0.001*2 (4.7)13 (44.8)<0.001*5 (20.0)24 (61.5)0.001*3 (27.3)17 (65.4)0.033*1 (4.2)4 (66.7)0.002*
    WMH (subcortical)0 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.3661 (0–1)0 (0–1)0.6430 (0–1)1 (0–2)0.2650 (0–1)0 (0–1)0.7500 (0–1)1 (0–2.25)0.209
    WMH (periventricular)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)0.9921 (1–2)1 (0–1.5)0.4711 (0.5–1.5)1 (1–3)0.2951 (0–2)1 (0–1)0.5591 (0.25–2)1 (1–1.25)0.732
    NIHSS-ad5 (3–9)7.5 (4–12)0.002*5 (3–9)6 (4–10.5)0.1495 (4–9.5)5 (4–11)0.8308.7±6.011.1±5.10.2245.0±2.47.2±2.30.064
    mRS ≥236 (34.3)69 (65.7)<0.001*10 (23.3)21 (72.4)<0.001*8 (32.0)24 (61.5)0.021*6 (54.5)22 (84.6)0.12612 (50.0)1 (16.7)0.311
    mRS ≥318 (17.5)47 (47.0)<0.001*3 (7.0)14 (48.3)<0.001*4 (16.0)15 (38.5)0.0554 (36.4)18 (69.2)0.1357 (29.2)0 (0)0.331
    mRS at discharge1 (1–2)2 (1–4)<0.001*1 (0–1)2 (1–4)<0.001*1 (1–2)2 (1–4)0.011*2 (1–4)4 (2–4)0.0881.5 (1–3)1 (1–1.25)0.210
    Hospitalisation (days)7 (6–9)8 (7–10)0.009*7 (6–8)8 (7–10)0.014*7 (6–8)9 (7–10)0.007*10(9-11)9 (6.75–11.25)0.2778 (6.25–10)7.5 (6.5–8.5)0.529
    r-tPA to MRI time (days)2 (1–3)2 (1–2)0.6242 (1–3)2 (1–3)0.9152 (1–3)1 (1–3)0.0572 (1–4)2 (1–2)0.1801 (1–2)1.5 (1–2.25)0.668
    • Data are presented as median (IQR), mean±SD or n (%).

    • *Significantly different.

    • BZ group, border-zone infarct group; FVH, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity; LT group, large territory infarct group; ML group, multiple lesion infarcts group; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS-ad, National Institute of Healthy Stroke Scale at admission; r-tPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; SL group, single cortical or subcortical lesion group; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.

  • Table 2

    Results of multiple logistic regression analysis for unfavourable (mRS ≥2) and poor (mRS ≥3) outcome in all patients and four subgroups

     All patientsBZ groupML groupLT groupSL group
    OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
    Model 1, mRS ≥2
     FVH (+)3.02 (1.49 to 6.13)0.0024.22 (1.25 to 14.25)0.0215.44 (1.41 to 20.92)0.0141.95 (0.24 to 15.90)0.5310.24 (0.01 to 7.36)0.410
     Male2.00 (0.86 to 4.66)0.1100.20 (0.02 to 2.12)0.1800.91 (0.17 to 4.99)0.9118.74 (0.31 to 246.91)0.2033.55 (0.49 to 25.78)0.211
     Age1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)0.8701.01 (0.96 to 1.08)0.6541.02 (0.96 to 1.09)0.4480.97 (0.89 to 1.06)0.4991.01 (0.93 to 1.11)0.761
     Occlusion1.67 (0.77 to 3.59)0.1921.14 (0.97 to 1.33)0.1030.58 (0.15 to 2.18)0.42020.51 (1.69 to 248.68)0.0181.08 (0.03 to 33.89)0.965
     NIHSS-ad1.18 (1.09 to 1.28)<0.00114.19 (1.40 to 143.85)0.0251.24 (1.06 to 1.46)0.0071.24 (0.96 to 1.60)0.0931.03 (0.72 to 1.46)0.882
    Model 2, mRS ≥3
     FVH (+)2.25 (1.01 to 4.97)0.0465.52 (0.98 to 31.07)0.0534.09 (1.04 to 16.16)0.0451.53 (0.16 to 14.40)0.709NANA
     Male1.40 (0.54 to 3.62)0.4880.30 (0.02 to 3.94)0.3630.56 (0.09 to 3.58)0.5378.48 (0.33 to 217.26)0.1970.70 (0.08 to 6.26)0.754
     Age1.00 (0.97 to 1.03)0.9371.05 (0.96 to 1.14)0.3381.03 (0.97 to 1.09)0.3180.88 (0.77 to 1.00)0.0511.04 (0.93 to 1.16)0.511
     Occlusion2.90 (1.32 to 6.37)0.00832.43 (3.21 to 327.27)0.0032.10 (0.57 to 7.82)0.2685.39 (0.54 to 54.04)0.1520.01 (0.01 to 999.99)0.999
     NIHSS-ad1.21 (1.11 to 1.31)<0.0011.34 (1.07 to 1.68)0.0101.14 (1.02 to 1.27)0.0191.69 (1.18 to 2.44)0.0041.30 (0.83 to 2.02)0.253
    • Model 1 used mRS ≥2 as dependent variable; model 2 used mRS ≥3 as dependent variable.

    • The bolded entries mean significance.

    • BZ group, border-zone infarct group; FVH, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity; LT group, large territory infarct group; ML group, multiple lesion infarcts group; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NA, not available; NIHSS-ad, National Institute of Healthy Stroke Scale at admission; SL group, single cortical or subcortical lesion group.

  • Table 3

    The distribution of FVHs in four subgroups

     FVH within DWI lesionFVH beyond DWI lesionFVH (both within and beyond)
    Total patients, n=100, (%)14 (14.0)73 (73.0)13 (13.0)
    BZ group, n=29, (%)1 (3.4)26 (89.7)2 (6.9)
    ML group, n=39, (%)0 (0)38 (97.4)1 (2.6)
    LT group, n=26, (%)13 (50.0)3 (11.5)10 (38.5)
    SL group, n=6, (%)0 (0)6 (100)0 (0)
    • BZ group, border-zone infarct group; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; FVH, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity; LT group, large territory infarct group; ML group, multiple lesion infarcts group; SL group, single cortical or subcortical lesion group.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000641supp001.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 10 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 10 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with different lesion patterns in patients with intravenous thrombolysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Association between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with different lesion patterns in patients with intravenous thrombolysis
Erling Wang, Chuanjie Wu, Dandan Yang, Xihai Zhao, Jie Zhao, Hong Chang, Qi Yang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000641; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000641

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Association between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with different lesion patterns in patients with intravenous thrombolysis
Erling Wang, Chuanjie Wu, Dandan Yang, Xihai Zhao, Jie Zhao, Hong Chang, Qi Yang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000641; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000641
Download PDF

Share
Association between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity and outcome varies with different lesion patterns in patients with intravenous thrombolysis
Erling Wang, Chuanjie Wu, Dandan Yang, Xihai Zhao, Jie Zhao, Hong Chang, Qi Yang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000641; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000641
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association