Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack

Lei Zhang, Junfeng Shi, Yuesong Pan, Zixiao Li, Hongyi Yan, Chelsea Liu, Wei Lv, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000471 Published 1 February 2021
Lei Zhang
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
2Changping District Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lei Zhang
Junfeng Shi
3Yixing People’s Hospital, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuesong Pan
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuesong Pan
Zixiao Li
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zixiao Li
Hongyi Yan
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chelsea Liu
5Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei Lv
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xia Meng
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongjun Wang
1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
4China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yongjun Wang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flowchart of the study. AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; CNSR II, China National Stroke Registry II; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Probability of survival free of recurrent stroke or all-cause death after acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack by the composite or regimen persistence. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves of survival free of recurrent stroke by the composite persistence. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves of survival free of recurrent stroke by the regimen persistence. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves of survival free of all-cause death by the composite persistence. (D) Kaplan-Meier curves of survival free of all-cause death by the regimen persistence.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Baseline characteristics in patient level and 3-month composite persistence of the study population

    VariablesComposite persistence*
    OverallLevel ILevel IILevel IIIP value
    n=18 344n=4397n=5464n=8483
    Patient level
    Age, median (IQR), years64 (56–73)67 (58–76)64 (56–73)64 (56–73)<0.001
    Female, n (%)6651 (36.3)1585 (36.1)2114 (38.7)2952 (34.8)<0.001
    Ethnicity (Han), n (%)17 789 (97.0)4246 (96.6)5285 (96.7)8258 (97.4)0.02
    Education level, n (%)<0.001
     High school or above5949 (32.4)1262 (28.7)1895 (34.7)2792 (32.9)
     Middle school4349 (23.7)1028 (23.4)1326 (24.3)1995 (23.5)
     Elementary or below8046 (43.9)2107 (47.9)2243 (41.1)3696 (43.6)
    Health insurance, n (%)<0.001
     UBMIS9527 (51.9)2105 (47.9)2972 (54.4)4450 (52.5)
     NRCMS7197 (39.2)1905 (43.3)2016 (36.9)3276 (38.6)
     Commercial insurance58 (0.3)16 (0.4)18 (0.3)24 (0.3)
     Self-payment1562 (8.5)371 (8.4)458 (8.4)733 (8.6)
    Family income per month >3000 yuan
    (US$434), n (%)
    2171 (11.8)493 (11.2)710 (13.0)968 (11.4)0.006
    Medical history, n (%)
     Hypertension11 905 (64.9)2369 (53.9)4016 (73.5)5520 (65.1)<0.001
     Diabetes3772 (20.6)535 (12.2)1570 (28.7)1667 (19.7)<0.001
     Dyslipidaemia2320 (12.7)470 (10.7)769 (14.1)1081 (12.7)<0.001
     Atrial fibrillation1103 (6.0)282 (6.4)361 (6.6)460 (5.4)0.007
     Myocardial infarction439 (2.4)105 (2.4)123 (2.3)211 (2.5)0.67
     Coronary artery disease2068 (11.3)491 (11.2)641 (11.7)936 (11.0)0.43
     Previous TIA1002 (5.5)246 (5.6)324 (5.9)432 (5.1)0.10
     Previous stroke5508 (30.0)1294 (29.4)1612 (29.5)2602 (30.7)0.21
     Ever smoking8197 (44.7)1943 (44.2)2404 (44.0)3850 (45.4)0.21
     Drinking5579 (30.4)1297 (29.5)1621 (29.7)2661 (31.4)0.03
    Admission NIHSS score, median (IQR)3 (1–6)4 (1–7)3 (1–6)3 (1–6)<0.001
    Type of disease, n (%)<0.001
     Ischaemic stroke16 563 (90.3)3894 (88.6)4950 (90.6)7719 (91.0)
     TIA1781 (9.7)503 (11.4)514 (9.4)764 (9.0)
    Severity of illness at discharge, n (%)<0.001
     mRS >33552 (19.4)965 (22.0)986 (18.1)1601 (18.9)
     mRS ≤214 777 (80.6)3430 (78.0)4470 (81.9)6877 (81.1)
     New stroke within 3 months, n (%)770 (4.2)235 (5.3)193 (3.5)342 (4.0)<0.001
    • *Composite persistence was defined as the percentage (0% to 100%) of discharge medication classes that patients were still taking at 3 months. Level I: persistence=0%; level II: 0%<persistence<100%; level III: persistence=100%.

    • mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; NRCMS, new rural cooperative medical schemes; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; UBMIS, urban basic medical insurance schemes.

  • Table 2

    Baseline characteristics in hospital level and 3-month composite persistence of the study population

    VariablesComposite persistence*
    OverallLevel ILevel IILevel IIIP value
    n=18 344n=4397n=5464n=8483
    Hospital level
    Hospital grade, n (%)0.72
     Tertiary12 472 (68.0)2968 (67.5)3719 (68.1)5785 (68.2)
     Secondary5872 (32.0)1429 (32.5)1745 (31.9)2698 (31.8)
    Region, n (%)<0.001
     Eastern10 947 (59.7)2678 (60.9)3360 (61.5)4909 (57.9)
     Central4250 (23.2)1020 (23.2)1161 (21.3)2069 (24.4)
     Western3147 (17.2)699 (15.9)943 (17.3)1505 (17.7)
    Teaching hospital, n (%)10 276 (56.0)2502 (56.9)3046 (55.8)4728 (55.7)0.40
    Stroke unit, n (%)10 312 (56.2)2297 (52.2)3073 (56.2)4942 (58.3)<0.001
    Hospital beds >1000, n (%)8725 (47.6)2047 (46.6)2731 (50.0)3947 (46.5)<0.001
    No of neurological ward beds >80, n (%)9830 (53.6)2116 (48.1)2892 (52.9)4822 (56.8)<0.001
    • *Composite persistence was defined as the percentage (0% to 100%) of discharge medication classes that patients were still taking at 3 months. Level I: persistence=0%; level II: 0%<persistence<100%; level III: persistence=100%.

  • Table 3

    Outcomes after ischaemic stroke or TIA by 3-month composite persistence

    OutcomesComposite persistenceNEvents,
    n (%)
    Model 1*Model 2†
    Adjusted HR/OR (95% CI)P valueAdjusted HR/OR (95% CI)P value
    StrokeLevel I4397134 (3.1)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Level II546480 (1.5)0.49 (0.37 to 0.64)<0.0010.41 (0.31 to 0.54)<0.001
    Level III8483101 (1.2)0.40 (0.31 to 0.52)<0.0010.37 (0.28 to 0.48)<0.001
    Composite events‡Level I4397159 (3.6)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Level II546497 (1.8)0.50 (0.38 to 0.64)<0.0010.41 (0.32 to 0.53)<0.001
    Level III8483125 (1.5)0.42 (0.33 to 0.53)<0.0010.38 (0.30 to 0.49)<0.001
    All-cause deathLevel I4397367 (8.4)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Level II5464120 (2.2)0.29 (0.24 to 0.36)<0.0010.28 (0.23 to 0.35)<0.001
    Level III8483123 (1.5)0.20 (0.16 to 0.24)<0.0010.20 (0.16 to 0.24)<0.001
    Disability (mRS=3–5)Level I3733595 (15.9)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Level II5069704 (13.9)0.93 (0.82 to 1.06)0.260.89 (0.77 to 1.03)0.11
    Level III77621022(13.2)0.88 (0.79 to 0.99)0.0260.82 (0.72 to 0.93)0.003
    • Composite persistence was defined as the percentage (0% to 100%) of discharge medication classes that patients were still taking at 3 months. Level I: persistence=0%; level II: 0%<persistence<100%; level III: persistence=100%.

    • HR for stroke, composite events and all-cause death; OR for disability.

    • *Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.

    • †Model 2: adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, including age, sex, ethnicity, education level, health insurance, family income per month, history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, previous TIA or stroke, ever smoking and drinking, admission NIHSS score, type of disease, severity of illness at discharge, new stroke within 3 months, hospital grade, region, teaching hospital, stroke unit, hospital beds and number of neurological ward beds.

    • ‡Composite events: stroke, myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular cause.

    • mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; Ref, reference; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

  • Table 4

    Outcomes after ischaemic stroke or TIA by 3-month regimen persistence

    OutcomesRegimen persistenceNEvents,
    n (%)
    Model 1*Model 2†
    Adjusted HR/OR
    (95% CI)
    P valueAdjusted HR/OR
    (95% CI)
    P value
    StrokeNon-persistent9861214 (2.2)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Persistent8483101 (1.2)0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)<0.0010.57 (0.45 to 0.73)<0.001
    Composite events‡Non-persistent9861256 (2.6)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Persistent8483125 (1.5)0.58 (0.47 to 0.72)<0.0010.59 (0.48 to 0.74)<0.001
    All-cause deathNon-persistent9861487 (4.9)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Persistent8483123 (1.5)0.31 (0.26 to 0.38)<0.0010.32 (0.26 to 0.39)<0.001
    Disability (mRS=3–5)Non-persistent88021299 (14.8)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
    Persistent77621022 (13.2)0.92 (0.84 to 1.00)0.05450.87 (0.79 to 0.97)0.01
    • Regimen persistence was referred to an all-or-none measure where patients who continued all discharge medication classes at the 3-month follow-up were considered persistent, whereas patients who discontinued at least one class of discharge medications were considered non-persistent.

    • HR for stroke, composite events and all-cause death; OR for disability.

    • *Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.

    • †Model 2: adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, including age, sex, ethnicity, education level, health insurance, family income per month, history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, previous TIA or stroke, ever smoking and drinking, admission NIHSS score, type of disease, severity of illness at discharge, new stroke within 3 months, hospital grade, region, teaching hospital, stroke unit, hospital beds and number of neurological ward beds.

    • ‡Composite events: stroke, myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular cause.

    • mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; Ref, reference; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000471supp001.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000471supp002.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000471supp003.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000471supp004.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000471supp005.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
    • Data supplement 2
    • Data supplement 3
    • Data supplement 4
    • Data supplement 5
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 10 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 10 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
Lei Zhang, Junfeng Shi, Yuesong Pan, Zixiao Li, Hongyi Yan, Chelsea Liu, Wei Lv, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000471; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000471

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
Lei Zhang, Junfeng Shi, Yuesong Pan, Zixiao Li, Hongyi Yan, Chelsea Liu, Wei Lv, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000471; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000471
Download PDF

Share
Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
Lei Zhang, Junfeng Shi, Yuesong Pan, Zixiao Li, Hongyi Yan, Chelsea Liu, Wei Lv, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2021, svn-2020-000471; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000471
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association