Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?

Adam Ingleton, Marko Raseta, Rui-En Chung, Kevin Jun Hui Kow, Jake Weddell, Sanjeev Nayak, Changez Jadun, Zafar Hashim, Noman Qayyum, Phillip Ferdinand, Indira Natarajan, Christine Roffe
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002267 Published 21 June 2024
Adam Ingleton
1 Neurosciences, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adam Ingleton
Marko Raseta
2 Statistics and Mathematical Modelling, Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rui-En Chung
3 Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Jun Hui Kow
3 Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jake Weddell
4 School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjeev Nayak
5 Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changez Jadun
5 Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zafar Hashim
5 Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noman Qayyum
5 Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillip Ferdinand
1 Neurosciences, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Indira Natarajan
1 Neurosciences, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Roffe
1 Neurosciences, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
6 Stroke Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    *Clinical thrombectomy pathway. Patients who had contraindications to thrombolysis were given oral antiplatelets (aspirin or clopidogrel, if aspirin intolerance) before thrombectomy, unless fully anticoagulated. The indications and contraindications were for guidance, with final treatment decisions made by the responsible clinician. BA, basilar artery; HT1, haemorrhagic transformation 1; HT2, haemorrhagic transformation 2; INR, International Normalised Ratio; iv Aspirin, intravenous aspirin at a dose of 500mg; ICA, internal carotid artery; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; M1, proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2, Sylvain Segment of the middle cerebral artery; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage; VA, vertebral artery.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Baseline demographics and clinical details

    All thrombectomies
    (n=565)
    Thrombectomies with stenting
    (n=102)
    Stent
    (n=102)
    No stent
    (n=463)
    P valueAspirin
    (n=49)
    No aspirin (n=53)P valueThrombolysis
    (n=76)
    No thrombolysis (n=26)P value
    Age (years) median (IQR)67 (57–72)70 (60–77)0.004*68 (55–75)66 (57–70)0.40*62 (55.75–71)68.5 (60–78)0.03*
    Male sex (n (%))70 (69%)233 (50%)0.001†27 (55%)43 (81%)0.009†60 (79%)10 (38%)0.0003†
    Hypertension
    (n (%))
    51 (50%)234 (51%)1†21 (43%)30 (57%)0.23†36 (47%)15 (58%)0.50†
    Atrial fibrillation
    (n (%))
    4 (4%)153 (33%)<0.001†2 (4%)2 (4%)1†2 (3%)2 (8%)0.27†
    Hyperlipidaemia
    (n (%))
    27 (26%)124 (27%)1†10 (20%)17 (32%)0.27†19 (25%)8 (31%)0.75†
    Diabetes (n (%))18 (18%)70 (15%)0.63†7 (14%)11 (21%)0.55†15 (20%)3 (12%)0.55†
    Previous stroke/TIA (n (%))13 (13%)69 (15%)0.69†7 (14%)6 (11%)0.88†9 (12%)4 (15%)0.73†
    Thrombolysis
    (n (%))
    76 (75%)354 (76%)0.77†34 (69%)42 (79%)0.36†NANANA
    NIHSS at baseline (median (IQR))18 (13–23)18 (14–22)0.87*19 (15–23)18 (9–23)0.22*19(14-23)15.5 (10–22.5)0.20*
    Anterior circulation (n (%))94 (92%)416 (90%)0.60†45 (92%)49 (92%)1†70 (92%)24 (92%)1†
    Posterior circulation (n (%))8 (8%)47 (10%)0.60†4 (8%)4 (8%)1†7 (8%)2 (8%)1†
    Onset to groin time (min)
    (median (IQR))
    269 (195–343)261 (201–332)0.93*277 (204–359)260 (195–325)0.36*253 (195–322.5)287 (195–500)0.30*
    Onset to lysis time (min)
    (median (IQR))
    123 (90–160)135 (105–182)<0.001*115 (90–152)123 (94–168)<0.001*123(90-160)nana
    Collateral score
    (n (%))
    1†0.11†
     Level 117 (44%)17 (41%)29 (49%)5 (24%)
     Level 217 (44%)19 (46%)24 (41%)12 (57%)
     Level 35 (12%)5 (13%)6 (10%)4 (19%)
    ASPECTS score7 (6.75–9)8 (6–9)0.88*8 (6–9)7 (7–9)1*
    • *Mann-Whitney U test.

    • †Z-test.

    • ‡Fisher’s exact test.

    • ASPECTS, The Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score; NIHSS, National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale score; TIA, Transient ischemic attack.

  • Table 2

    Complications and outcomes in patients who were stented during thrombectomy with or without intraoperative aspirin

    All thrombectomies (n=565)Thrombectomies with stenting (n=102)
    Stent
    (n=102)
    No stent
    (n=463)
    P valueAspirin
    (n=49)
    No aspirin (n=53)P value
    Thrombolysis in cerebral infarct score ≥2b (n (%))92 (90%)414 (90%)0.96*43 (88%)49 (92%)0.51*
    NIHSS at 7 days median (IQR)10 (3–20)6 (2–16)0.08†5 (2–17)15 (4–32)0.03†
    NIHSS difference baseline to 7 days median (IQR)6 (-3–13)9 (1–14)0.02†8 (1–16)3 (-9–8)0.003†
    Infarction at 24 hours (n (%))79 (77%)331 (72%)0.27*35 (71%)44 (83%)0.25*
    Malignant middle cerebral artery syndrome (n (%))6 (6%)36 (8%)0.65*1 (2%)5 (9%)0.21‡
    Hemicraniectomy (n (%))2 (2%)9 (2%)1‡1 (2%)1 (2%)1‡
    Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (n (%))11 (11%)30 (7%)0.19*2 (4%)9 (17%)0.08*
    Subarachnoid haemorrhage (n (%))10 (10%)42 (9%)0.97*6 (12%)4 (7%)0.51‡
    Stroke within 90 days (n (%))0 (0.0%)9 (2%)0.37‡0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1‡
    Death at 90 days (n (%))22 (22%)76 (16%)0.27*10 (20%)12 (23%)0.97*
    mRS 0–2 at 90 days (n (%))44 (43%)221 (48%)0.46*25 (51%)19 (36%)0.18*
    • *Z-test.

    • †Mann-Whitney U test.

    • ‡Fisher’s exact test.

    • NIHSS, National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale score.

  • Table 3

    Complications and outcomes in stented patients in relation to aspirin and thrombolysis

    Aspirin given intraoperatively (n=49)No aspirin given intraoperatively (n=53)
    Thrombolysed
    (n=34)
    Not thrombolysed
    (n=15)
    P valueThrombolysed
    (n=42)
    Not thrombolysed
    (n=11)
    P value
    Thrombolysis in cerebral infarct score ≥2b (n (%))33 (97%)10 (67%)0.008*39 (93%)10 (90%)1*
    NIHSS at 7 days median (IQR)5 (2–14)16 (2–36)0.09†15 (3–34)15(5–21)0.63†
    NIHSS difference baseline to 7 days median (IQR)12 (4–18)7 (-7–10)0.01†4 (-6–9)2 (–12–4)0.24†
    Infarction at 24 hours (n (%))26 (76%)9 (60%)0.31*34 (81%)10 (91%)0.67*
    Malignant middle cerebral artery syndrome (n (%))0 (0%)1 (7%)0.31*5 (12%)0 (0%)0.57*
    Hemicraniectomy (n (%))0 (0%)1 (7%)0.31*1 (2%)0 (0%)1*
    Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (n (%))1 (3%)1 (6%)1*4 (10%)5 (46%)0.01*
    Subarachnoid haemorrhage (n (%))4 (12%)2 (13%)1*2 (5%)2 (18%)0.19*
    Stroke within 90 days (n (%))0 (0%)0 (0%)1*0 (0%)0 (0%)1*
    Death at 90 days (n (%))4 (12%)6 (40%)0.05*8 (19%)4 (36%)0.24*
    mRS 0–2 at 90 days (n (%))20 (59%)5 (33%)0.18‡16 (38%)3 (27%)0.73*
    • *Fisher’s exact test.

    • †Mann-Whitney U test.

    • ‡Z-test.

    • mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale score.

  • Table 4

    Studies of emergent stenting during mechnical thrombectomy with details of the use of intraprocedural antiplatelet agents.

    Observational Studies
    PaperNumber stented/total casesIndicationCentresNIHSS before
    MT
    (median)
    TerritoryTICI ≥2Key outcome mRS≤2Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhageAntiplatelet choiceThrombolysisMortality at 3 months
    Behme et al 2 170/170ESMulti (4)15Carotid77%36%9%Eptifibatide or tirofiban or aspirin 500 intravenous and clopidogrel via nasogastric tube72%19% (discharge)
    Papanagiotou et al 4 322/482ESMulti16Carotid81.1%55.0%7.1%Variable intravenous aspirin, intravenous GP IIb/IIIa Inh, clopidogrel
    heparin
    62%11.2%
    Zhu et al TITAN registry5 256/295ESMultiNDCarotid83.1%57.9%5.1%All below60%9.5%
    4.4%Antiplatelet and lysis (136)
    8.6%Antiplatelet alone (92)
    9.0%Lysis alone (11)
    0%Neither (7)
    Anadani et al TITAN Registry6 205/205ESMultiNDCarotid81%56.6%5.9%Type of antiplatelet regime not reported60%12.7%
    Hadler et al 7 73/548xxSinglexxCarotidxx40.6%16%Tirofiban, dual antiplatelet therapy65.8%28.1%
    Chang et al 8 48/148RSMulti14Carotid, M164.6%39.6%16.7%GP IIb/IIIa Inh and /or antiplatelets46% intravenous, 15% ia12.5%
    Stracke et al 9 210/210RSMulti13Any82.9%44.8%10.5%At least one agent, detail not fully reported31%18.5%
    Delvoye et al 25 60/218ESSingle16CarotidND58.1%9.3%Aspirin intravenous 250 mg (43) or53.5%18.6%
    1237.5%25%abciximab 0.25 mg/kg (8)50.0%37.5%
    1733.3%11.1%Bolus and infusion (9)33.3%11.1%
    Peng et al 26 90/339RSMulti (16)17Anterior circulationND36.4%13.6%TirofibanYes31.9%
    Schaefer et al 27 26/122RSSingle15*NDNDND3.6%ND39%36% (discharge)
    Mohamedan et al 28 107/499RSMulti (14)16CarotidND34.6%7.5%Not specified29% intravenous 2% ia29.9%
    Ingleton et al 102/565RSSingle18Carotid, VA90%43%11%All 102 (100%)75%22%
    1988%51%4%Aspirin 500 mg intravenous in 49 (48%)69%20%
    1892%51%4%No asprin l in 53 (52%)79%23%
    Metanalyses and systematic Reviews
    PaperNumber stented/total casesIndicationCentresNIHSS before
    MT
    (median)
    TerritoryTICI ≥2Key outcome mRS≤2Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhageAntiplatelet choiceThrombolysisMortality at 3 months
    Dufort et al 29 1635ESMeta-analysis of 16 studiesNDAnterior circulationND53.7%8.3%VariableNot specified13.4%
    Paul et al 30 129ESPooled analysisNDAny100%ND6.2%IV cangrelor23.4%ND
    Sadeh-Gonik et al 31 338ESMeta-analysis of 14 studies16*Anterior circulation76%53%7%Not specified65%14%
    Maingard et al 32 365RSMeta-analysis of 12 studies16*Anterior circulation35.7%48.5%9.7%Tirofioban, heparin, abciximab, aspirin, clopidogrel,35.7%21.9%
    Sivan-Hoffman et al 33 193ESMeta-analysis of 11 studies 2010–201517*Carotid63.8%44%7%Not specified54%13%
    Cai et al 34 774/1595ESMeta-analysis of 15 studiesNDAny78.5%37.8%†8.3%†Not specified31.8% median22.5%**
    • Observational studies including 20 or more patients and meta-analyses of emergent or rescue stenting after mechanical thrombectomy.

    • *Study used mean as measure of NIHSS baseline, TICI.

    • †Total number of participants is 1595. The total number of stented patients is 774. Percentages were calculated, where information available in tables and figures.

    • BA, basilar artery; ES, emergent stenting; GP IIb/IIIa Inh, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors; M1, proximal segment of the middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale ; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; ND, not disclosed within article; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; RS, rescue stenting; TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarct; VA, vertebral artery; xx, unavailable.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2022-002267supp001.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 3 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 9 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?
Adam Ingleton, Marko Raseta, Rui-En Chung, Kevin Jun Hui Kow, Jake Weddell, Sanjeev Nayak, Changez Jadun, Zafar Hashim, Noman Qayyum, Phillip Ferdinand, Indira Natarajan, Christine Roffe
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Jun 2024, 9 (3) 279-288; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002267

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?
Adam Ingleton, Marko Raseta, Rui-En Chung, Kevin Jun Hui Kow, Jake Weddell, Sanjeev Nayak, Changez Jadun, Zafar Hashim, Noman Qayyum, Phillip Ferdinand, Indira Natarajan, Christine Roffe
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Jun 2024, 9 (3) 279-288; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002267
Download PDF

Share
Is intraprocedural intravenous aspirin safe for patients who require emergent extracranial stenting during mechanical thrombectomy?
Adam Ingleton, Marko Raseta, Rui-En Chung, Kevin Jun Hui Kow, Jake Weddell, Sanjeev Nayak, Changez Jadun, Zafar Hashim, Noman Qayyum, Phillip Ferdinand, Indira Natarajan, Christine Roffe
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Jun 2024, 9 (3) 279-288; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002267
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association