Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study

Gang Luo, Xiaoyan Yan, Guodong Xiao, Liping Wei, Ya li kun Nai bi jiang, Rongyao Ma, Wenhuo Chen, Chun Fang, Zhiming Zhou, Jieqing Wan, Ya Peng, Guilian Zhang, Junfeng Zhao, Li Li, Haicheng Yuan, Jin Wu, Bing Li, Fan Zhang, Yuhong Cheng, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002036 Published 29 December 2023
Gang Luo
1 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
2 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gang Luo
Xiaoyan Yan
3 Biostatistics, Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guodong Xiao
4 Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Jiangsu, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liping Wei
5 Department of Neurology, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, Henan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya li kun Nai bi jiang
6 Neurosurgery, Hotan District People's Hospital, Hotan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rongyao Ma
7 Neurology, Nanshi Hospital of Nanyang, Nanyang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenhuo Chen
8 Neurology, Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province and Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chun Fang
9 Department of Intervention, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiming Zhou
10 Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jieqing Wan
11 Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya Peng
12 Department of Neurosurgery, Changzhou No. 1 People's Hospital, Changzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guilian Zhang
13 Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junfeng Zhao
14 Neurology, Siping Central People’s Hospital, Siping, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Li
15 Department of Intervention, Xijing Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haicheng Yuan
16 Neurology, Qingdao Central Medical Group, Qingdao, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin Wu
17 Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jin Wu
Bing Li
18 Department of Intervention, Qindao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fan Zhang
19 Neurology, Hainan General Hospital/Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuhong Cheng
20 Department of Intervention, Linfen Central Hospital, Linfen, Shanxi, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Gao
1 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
2 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhongrong Miao
1 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
2 Department of Intervention, Interventional Neuroradiology Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Illustration of the Catfish stent-retriever device. (A) The thinner strut of the proximal-third segment and distal-third segment which was equal to 0.7-fold diameter of strut at middle-third segment, three distal radio-opaque markers. A2: large clot catching cell. A3: radiopaque platinum wire integration into the stent strut. A4: One Proximal radio-opaque marker. (B) The Catfish (B2) have a larger stent cells compared to the competitive stent (B1). (C) The Catfish have a optimal coverage and wall apposition peculiarity in tortuous anatomical model. (D) Fluoroscopic visibility of the deployed Catfish stent retriever device.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Trial profile. mRS, modified Rankin scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Treatment outcomes. (A) Immediately mTICI grade after first pass thrombectomy; (B) mTICI grade at the end of the procedure, the successful recanalisation rate at the end of the precedure in the Catfish group was non-inferior to that in the Solitaire group for per-protocol population analysis (rate difference, 0.83; 95% CI –7.03 to 8.70;). (C) and (D) Modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. mTICI, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Categorised whisker plots of mean NIHSS scores at admission, at 24 hours, and at 7 days or discharge in both groups. NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Baseline clinicodemographic features

    Catfish group
    (n=113)
    Solitaire group
    (n=114)
    Age (years)62.0 (13.2)62.2 (12.4)
    Male59 (52.2)72 (63.2)
    NIHSS score
     Mean (SD)15.9 (4.6)15.1 (4.3)
     Median (range)16 (12–20)16 (12–20)
    Pre-stroke mRS score
     098 (86.7)104 (91.2)
     115 (13.3)9 (7.9)
     200
     300
     41 (0.4)0
    Intravenous t–PA pre-procedure46 (40.7)46 (40.3)
    Medical history
     Hypertension68 (60.2)69 (60.5)
     Diabetes mellitus11 (9.7)13 (11.4)
     Hyperlipidaemia9 (8.0)7 (6.1)
     Atrial fibrillation45 (39.8)40 (35.1)
     Ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack21 (18.6)25 (21.9)
     Myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease23 (20.4)25 (21.9)
    Admission systolic blood pressure, mm Hg142.8 (20.4)144.1 (20.9)
    Admission diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg82.1 (12.1)82.9 (13.7)
    Baseline ASPECT score
     Mean (SD)8.1 (1.3)8.1 (1.29)
     Median (range)8 (7–9)8 (7–9)
    Baseline pc–ASPECT score
     Mean (SD)9.88 (0.6)9.56 (1.7)
     Median (range)10 (10–10)10 (10–10)
    Site of occlusion
     Internal carotid artery (ICA)30 (26.6)34 (30.1)
     Anterior cerebral artery3 (2.7)1 (0.9)
     Middle cerebral artery
      M158 (51.3)67 (59.3)
      M213 (11.5)6 (5.3)
     Posterior circulation
      V42 (1.8)0 (0)
      Basilar artery3 (2.7)4 (3.5)
      Posterior cerebral artery1 (0.9)0 (0)
     Other
      Tandem cervical ICA3 (2.7)1 (0.9)
    Onset to main hospital arrival, min195 (115–240)170 (114–240)
    • Data are mean (SD), n (%) or median (IQR).

    • ASPECT, Alberta stroke program early CT score; M1, first segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2, second segment of the middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; pc–ASPECT, Posterior circulation–Alberta stroke programme early CT score; tPA, alteplase; V4, fourth segment of the vertebral artery.

  • Table 2

    Efficacy endpoints and procedure details

    Catfish group (n=113)Solitaire group (n=114)Rate difference
    (95% CI)
    Non-inferiority P value
    Primary efficacy endpoint
    Successful recanalisation at the end of the procedure
     Per-treatment100 (88.5)100 (87.7)0.78 (–7.64 to 9.20)0.001
     Per-protocol98 (90.7; n=108)98 (89.9; n=109)0.83 (–7.03 to 8.70)<0.001
    Secondary efficacy endpoints
    Time from arterial puncture to final reperfusion, min81.6 (46.2)82.2 (58.8)NANA
    mTICI 2b/3 after first pass58 (51.8; n=112)61 (54.0; n=113)NANA
     2b16 (14.2)27 (23.9)NANA
     342 (37.5)34 (30.0)NANA
    Successful recanalisation with study device
     Per-treatment87 (88.8; n=98)85 (89.5; n=95)–0.70 (–9.48 to 8.08)0.004
     Per-protocol86 (91.5; n=94)84 (92.3; n=91)–0.82 (–8.68 to 7.04)0.002
    Use of rescue treatmentNANA
     Balloon angioplasty8 (53.3; n=15)7 (36.8; n=19)
     Stent implantation4 (26.7; n=15)9 (47.4; n=19)
     Balloon angioplasty+stent implantation3 (20.0; n=15)3 (15.8; n=19)
    NIHSS score at 24 hours15.8 (11.3; n=109)13.8 (9.3; n=111)NANA
    NIHSS score at 7 days13.4 (12.0; n=111)11.5 (10.3; n=113)NANA
    Good neurological outcome at 90 days (mRS score of 0–2)
     Per-treatment54 (47.8)57 (50.0)NANA
     Per–protocol53 (49.1; n=108)55 (50.5; n=109)NANA
    • Data are mean (SD), n (%) or median (IQR).

    • The successful recanalisation rate after procedure completion in the Catfish group was non-inferior to that of the Solitaire group for per-treatment analysis; the common OR was 0.78 (95% CI, –7.64 to 9.20; p=0.001).

    • mRS, modified Rankin Scale; mTICI, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; Per-protocol, per-protocol analysis; Per-treatment, per-treatment analysis.

  • Table 3

    Safety endpoints

    Catfish group (n=113)Solitaire group (n=114)
    Serious adverse events
     Study device-associated15 (13.3)12 (10.5)
     Procedure-associated
     Local puncture site haematoma01 (0.9)
     Embolisation in a new vascular territory1 (0.9)3 (2.6)
     Arterial perforation2 (1.8)1 (0.9)
     Vasospasm17 (15.0)9 (7.9)
     Subarachnoid haemorrhage5 (4.4)4 (3.5)
    Symptomatic haemorrhage9 (8.0)9 (7.9)
    All-cause death by 90 days20 (17.7)18 (15.8)
    • Data are n (%).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 8 Issue 6 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 8 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study
Gang Luo, Xiaoyan Yan, Guodong Xiao, Liping Wei, Ya li kun Nai bi jiang, Rongyao Ma, Wenhuo Chen, Chun Fang, Zhiming Zhou, Jieqing Wan, Ya Peng, Guilian Zhang, Junfeng Zhao, Li Li, Haicheng Yuan, Jin Wu, Bing Li, Fan Zhang, Yuhong Cheng, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2023, 8 (6) 435-443; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study
Gang Luo, Xiaoyan Yan, Guodong Xiao, Liping Wei, Ya li kun Nai bi jiang, Rongyao Ma, Wenhuo Chen, Chun Fang, Zhiming Zhou, Jieqing Wan, Ya Peng, Guilian Zhang, Junfeng Zhao, Li Li, Haicheng Yuan, Jin Wu, Bing Li, Fan Zhang, Yuhong Cheng, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2023, 8 (6) 435-443; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002036
Download PDF

Share
Comparing a novel Catfish flow restoration device and the Solitaire stent retriever for thrombectomy revascularisation in emergent largevessel occlusion stroke: a prospective randomised controlled study
Gang Luo, Xiaoyan Yan, Guodong Xiao, Liping Wei, Ya li kun Nai bi jiang, Rongyao Ma, Wenhuo Chen, Chun Fang, Zhiming Zhou, Jieqing Wan, Ya Peng, Guilian Zhang, Junfeng Zhao, Li Li, Haicheng Yuan, Jin Wu, Bing Li, Fan Zhang, Yuhong Cheng, Feng Gao, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2023, 8 (6) 435-443; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-002036
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association