Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests

Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001096 Published 7 July 2022
Jianan Wang
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jianan Wang
Jungen Zhang
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoxian Gong
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenhua Zhang
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Zhou
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Min Lou
Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital Department of Neurology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow chart of the study population and process. AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; CTA, CT angiography; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TOF-MRA, time of flight MR angiography.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Illustration of features contributing to identification of LVO by Gini importance values. Gini importance is a measurement of the feature importance in the model, the higher the value of Gini importance is, the more important the feature is. LOC, level of consciousness; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Comparison of clinical characteristics between cohort of the training set and test set

    Cohort of the training set (n=15 365)Cohort of the test set
    (n=4215)
    P value
    Female, n (%)5868 (38.2)1518 (36.0)0.010
    Age, year, median (IQR)70 (60–79)71 (60–79)0.012
    Atrial fibrillation, n (%)3274 (21.3)804 (19.1)0.002
    Congestive heart failure, n (%)338 (2.2)75 (1.8)0.104
    Coronary heart disease, n (%)1283 (8.4)303 (7.2)0.015
    Family history of cardiovascular disease, n (%)174 (1.1)25 (0.6)0.002
    Smoking, n (%)4637 (30.2)1181 (28.0)0.007
    Hyperlipidaemia, n (%)890 (5.8)199 (4.7)0.008
    Diabetes mellitus, n (%)2497 (16.3)702 (16.7)0.526
    Hypertension, n (%)9815 (63.9)2624 (62.3)0.053
    History of stroke/TIA, n (%)1968 (12.8)560 (13.3)0.422
    Hyperhomocysteinaemia, n (%)1011 (6.6)237 (5.6)0.026
    Prior anticoagulation therapy, n (%)338 (2.2)83 (2.0)0.400
    Prior antiplatelet therapy, n (%)2191 (14.3)558 (13.2)0.094
    LVO, n (%)4417 (28.7)1279 (30.3)0.044
    Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median (IQR)154 (139–168)153 (139–167)0.450
    Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median (IQR)85 (76–94)84 (76–94)0.065
    NIHSS sum, median (IQR)6 (3–13)5 (2–12)<0.001
    NIHSS items
     LOC, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.288
     LOC questions, median (IQR)0 (0–1)0 (0–0)0.064
     LOC commands, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.020
     Gaze deviation, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.001
     Visual field test, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.341
     Facial palsy, median (IQR)1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.003
     Motor left arm, median (IQR)0 (0–2)0 (0–2)<0.001
     Motor right arm, median (IQR)0 (0–2)0 (0–2)0.258
     Motor left leg, median (IQR)0 (0–2)0 (0–2)<0.001
     Motor right leg, median (IQR)0 (0–2)0 (0–2)0.063
     Limb ataxia, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.002
     Sensory, median (IQR)1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.003
     Aphasia, median (IQR)0 (0–2)0 (0–2)0.003
     Dysarthria, median (IQR)1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.014
     Extinction and inattention, median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.678
    • LOC, level of consciousness; LVO, large vessel occlusion; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

  • Table 2

    Comparison of eight models to predict LVO in the test set

    AUC (95% CI)SENSPEAccuracy
    RF0.831 (0.819 to 0.843)0.7210.8270.772
    GBM0.831 (0.820 to 0.843)0.7210.8250.772
    XGBoost0.831 (0.820 to 0.844)0.7150.8250.770
    LightGBM0.828 (0.816 to 0.840)0.7210.8260.774
    Ada boosting0.828 (0.817 to 0.841)0.7040.8240.765
    ANN0.819 (0.817 to 0.842)0.7400.7810.761
    LR0.790 (0.778 to 0.804)0.7350.7460.740
    KNN0.774 (0.762 to 0.789)0.6850.7690.727
    • ANN, artificial neural network; AUC, area under the curve; GBM, gradient boosting machine; KNN, K-Nearest Neighbour; LR, logistic regression; LVO, large vessel occlusion stroke; RF, random forests; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; XGBoost, extreme gradient boosting.

  • Table 3

    Comparison of various published clinical scales with RF model to predict LVO in the test set

    Cut-offAUC (95% CI)SENSPEAccuracy
    RF—0.831 (0.819 to 0.843)0.7210.8270.772
    mNIHSS≥70.809 (0.795 to 0.824)0.7600.7550.769
    sNIHSS-EMS≥60.809 (0.795 to 0.824)0.7220.7880.764
    NIHSS≥60.806 (0.792 to 0.820)0.7270.7920.708
    RACE≥50.806 (0.791 to 0.821)0.7120.7930.764
    CPSSS≥20.804 (0.789 to 0.819)0.6580.8260.761
    FAST-ED≥40.804 (0.790 to 0.819)0.6110.8500.760
    s-NIHSS-5≥40.804 (0.790 to 0.819)0.7380.7630.760
    3I-SS≥40.798 (0.782 to 0.813)0.6410.8520.759
    LAMS≥40.779 (0.764 to 0.795)0.6520.8080.746
    PASS≥20.778 (0.763 to 0.794)0.6600.8230.751
    s-NIHSS-1≥20.773 (0.757 to 0.789)0.6980.7610.695
    FPSS≥50.762 (0.746 to 0.778)0.7810.6200.711
    G-FAST≥30.755 (0.740 to 0.771)0.7630.6530.697
    VAN≥20.732 (0.715 to 0.748)0.8470.5340.650
    ROSIER≥40.730 (0.714 to 0.746)0.8860.4670.694
    FAST≥30.706 (0.690 to 0.723)0.6820.6810.685
    aNIHSS≥10.689 (0.672 to 0.706)0.5420.7510.416
    • aNIHSS, abbreviated NIHSS; AUC, area under the curve; CPSSS, Cincinnati Pre-hospital Stroke Severity scale; EMS, emergency medical services; FAST-ED, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination scale; FPSS, Finnish Prehospital Stroke Scale; G-FAST, gaze–face–arm–speech–time test; 3I-SS, three-item Stroke Scale; LAMS, Los Angeles Motor Scale; LVO, large vessel occlusion stroke; mNIHSS, modified NIHSS; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PASS, Pre-hospital Acute Stroke Severity scale; RACE, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale; RF, random forests; ROSIER, Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room; SEN, sensitivity; sNIHSS, shortened versions of the NIHSS; SPE, specificity; VAN, stroke vision, aphasia, neglect assessment.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 2 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 7 (2)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests
Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Apr 2022, 7 (2) e001096; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001096

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests
Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Apr 2022, 7 (2) e001096; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001096
Download PDF

Share
Prediction of large vessel occlusion for ischaemic stroke by using the machine learning model random forests
Jianan Wang, Jungen Zhang, Xiaoxian Gong, Wenhua Zhang, Ying Zhou, Min Lou
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Apr 2022, 7 (2) e001096; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001096
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association