Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis

Nolwenn Riou-Comte, Benjamin Gory, Marc Soudant, François Zhu, Yu Xie, Lisa Humbertjean, Gioia Mione, Catherine Oppenheim, Francis Guillemin, Serge Bracard, Sébastien Richard
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000852 Published 24 December 2021
Nolwenn Riou-Comte
1 Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit, CIC-P 1433, INSERMU1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Gory
2 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, INSERM U1254, IADI, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Soudant
3 Clinical Investigation Centre-Clinical Epidemiology 1433, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marc Soudant
François Zhu
2 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, INSERM U1254, IADI, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Xie
2 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, INSERM U1254, IADI, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Humbertjean
1 Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit, CIC-P 1433, INSERMU1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gioia Mione
1 Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit, CIC-P 1433, INSERMU1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Oppenheim
4 Department of Neuroradiology, INSERM U894, Université Paris-Descartes, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Guillemin
3 Clinical Investigation Centre-Clinical Epidemiology 1433, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Bracard
2 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, INSERM U1254, IADI, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sébastien Richard
1 Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit, CIC-P 1433, INSERMU1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sébastien Richard
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Flow chart. Excellent outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1. *One of the requirements for mechanical thrombectomy was the absence of neurological improvement ≥4 points between baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and NIHSS within 1 hour of IVT. ICA, internal carotid artery occlusion; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; THRACE, Mechanical Thrombectomy After Intravenous Alteplase vs Alteplase Alone After Stroke.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Cohort description and bivariate analysis

    All
    (n=247)
    3-month mRS score 0–1
    (n=77)
    3-month mRS score 2–6
    (n=170)
    P value
    Sociodemographic features
    Age, n 247/24777/77170/1700.36*
    Mean (SD), years63.8 (13.9)62.5 (14.2)64.3 (13.8)
    Median (IQR), years68.0 (20.0)66.0 (22.0)68.5 (18.0)
    Sex, n
    Female, n (%)121/24744/7777/1700.084†
    Comorbidities and risk factors, n
    Diabetes 37/2428/7629/1660.16†
    Hypertension 137/24435/77102/1670.022†
    Hypercholesterolaemia 125/22040/7285/1480.79†
    Renal insufficiency 11/2421/7510/1670.18‡
    History of stroke 17/2415/7712/1641.00‡
    Coronaropathy 41/23311/7630/1600.38†
    Peripheral arterial disease 9/2262/757/1510.72‡
    Current smoking 53/22112/7541/1460.046†
    Baseline clinical status
    NIHSS score, n 245/24777/77168/170
    Mean (SD), pts16.9 (4.3)15.6 (4.1)17.5 (4.2)0.0013*
    Median (IQR), pts17.0 (7.0)15.0 (7.0)18.0 (7.0)
    Blood pressure, n 244/24777/77167/170
    SBP, mean (SD), mm Hg144 (23)144 (22)144 (23)0.87*
    DBP, mean (SD), mm Hg79 (16)77 (13)80 (17)0.26*
    Heart rate, n 242/24776/77166/170
    Mean (SD), bpm75 (17)75 (16)76 (17)0.81*
    Glycaemia, n 239/24775/77164/170
    Mean (SD), g/L1.24 (0.38)1.16 (0.26)1.27 (0.42)0.0099*
    Temperature, n 237/24773/77164/170
    Mean (SD), °C36.6 (0.5)36.7 (0.6)36.6 (0.5)0.48*
    Weight, n 243/24777/77166/174
    Mean (SD), kg75.7 (15.7)76.3 (14.4)75.4 (16.3)0.68*
    Baseline imaging characteristics
    Imaging techniques, n
    CT58/24714/7744/1700.19§
    MRI189/24763/77126/170
    Ischaemic core
    ASPECTS score, n 243/24776/77167/170
    Mean (SD), pts7.1 (2.3)7.8 (1.8)6.8 (2.5)0.010§
    DWI volume, n 184/18962/63122/126
    Mean (SD), mL40.2 (52.7)17.0 (16.7)52.0 (60.3)0.0003§
    Median (IQR), mL14.8 (44.7)10.5 (14.0)19.1 (71.8)
    Vascular territory of ischaemia, n
    Superficial and deep MCA territory126/23728/7598/1620.0031‡
    Superficial MCA26/23712/7514/162
    Deep MCA78/23733/7545/162
    ACA4/2370/754/162
    Anterior choroid artery3/2372/751/162
    Microvascular leukopathy
    Fazekas score of DWM, n
    Absence73/18330/6143/1220.24‡
    Punctuate foci65/18320/6145/122
    Beginning confluence29/1836/6123/122
    Large confluent areas16/1835/6111/122
    Thrombus
    Occlusion site, n
    C139/2404/7635/1640.0017†¶
    M1199/24071/76128/164
    M22/2401/761/164
    HMCAS/SVS, n
    Presence versus absence, n176/23455/75121/1590.65†
    Length, mean (SD), mm14.3 (10.7)11.3 (8.3)15.7 (11.4)0.0008§
    Clot burden score, mean (SD), pts7.0 (1.8)7.5 (1.5)6.8 (1.9)0.0016§
    Mismatch
    ASPECT-FVH score, n 151/18951/63100/1260.74§
    Mean (SD), pts3.6 (1.1)3.5 (1.0)3.6 (1.1)
    Median (IQR), pts4.0 (1.0)4.0 (1.0)4.0 (1.0)
    FVH/DWI mismatch
    Presence versus absence, n135/17753/6182/1160.016†
    Care workflow time
    Onset-to-Imaging time, n 242/24776/77166/170
    Mean (SD), min116 (43)110.6 (50.8)119.0 (39.0)0.20*
    Onset-to-thrombolysis time, n 245/24777/77168/170
    Mean (SD), min153 (40)142.2 (37.4)158.0 (41.0)0.0042*
    MRI-to-thrombolysis time, n 241/24776/77165/170
    Mean (SD), min40 (20)39.4 (20.6)40.1 (19.4)0.81*
    24-hour clinical and radiological features
    NIHSS score, n 230/24776/77154/170
    Mean (SD), pts11.6 (8.2)3.7 (3.5)15.5 (7.0)<0.0001§
    Median (IQR)11.0 (14.0)3.0 (6.0)16.0 (9.0)
    ASPECTS, n 235/24774/77161/170
    Mean (SD), pts5.9 (2.7)7.6 (1.6)5.1 (2.8)<0.0001§
    Haemorrhagic classification (SITS-MOST), n
    Absence163/23658/74105/1620.27‡
    Haemorrhagic infarction 126/2367/7419/162
    Haemorrhagic infarction 226/2365/7421/162
    Parenchymal haemorrhage 111/2363/748/162
    Parenchymal haemorrhage 210/2361/749/162
    • 3-month excellent outcome after IVT alone was defined as a mRS score ≤1.

    • *Statistical analysis was performed with the Student’s t-test.

    • †χ2 test.

    • ‡Fisher’s exact test.

    • §Kruskal-Wallis test.

    • ¶Comparison between C1 segment and M1/M2 segment.

    • ACA, anterior cerebral artery; ASPECT-FVH score (0–6), extent of FLAIR vascular hyperintensities based on ASPECTS territories and without counting insula (higher is better); ASPECTS (0–10), Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT score (higher is better); C1, distal intracranial portion of internal carotid artery; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DWI volume, diffusion-weighted imaging infarct volume; DWM, deep white matter; FVH/DWI mismatch, FLAIR vascular hyperintensities and diffusion-weighted imaging infarct hyperintensity mismatch; HMCAS, hyper-dense middle cerebral artery sign on CT; M1, first segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2, branches downstream of M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS score (0–42), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; pts, patients; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SITS-MOST, Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke MOnitoring STudY; SVS, susceptibility vessel sign on MRI; clot burden score (0–10): higher is better.

  • Table 2

    Predictors of 3-month excellent outcome after IVT

    3-month mRS score 0–1
    (n=77/247)
    Bivariate (n=247)Multivariate (n=247)
    OR95% CIP valueOR95% CIP value
    Sociodemographics features
    Age0.990.97 to 1.010.36
    Sex: male versus female0.620.36 to 1.070.09
    Comorbidities and risk factors
    Hypertension: absence versus presence1.871.42 to 2.47 0.024 2.431.74 to 3.380.0074
    Diabetes: absence versus presence1.830.80 to 4.220.15
    Current smoking: absence versus presence1.861.30 to 2.660.0832.761.79 to 4.260.019
    Baseline clinical examination
    NIHSS score, pts*0.900.84 to 0.96 0.0018
    Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg*1.000.99 to 1.010.91
    Glycaemia, g/L*0.390.17 to 0.92 0.031
    Temperature, °C*1.230.74 to 2.050.43
    OTT
    Hour*0.530.35 to 0.83 0.0048 0.470.23 to 0.780.0033
    Imaging features
    Imaging technique: CT versus MRI0.640.32 to 1.250.19
    DWI volume, 10 mL†‡0.850.77 to 0.94 0.0016 0.780.68 to 0.890.0004
    Infarct territory 0.0033
     Superficial MCAReference
     Deep MCA0.860.35 to 2.080.73
     Superficial and deep MCA0.340.14 to 0.81 0.015
     Other0.410.07 to 2.230.30
    Thrombus length‡
     HMCAS length, mm*0.950.91 to 1.00 0.030 0.980.92 to 1.030.37
     SVS length, mm*0.960.93 to 0.99 0.017 0.870.80 to 0.940.0012
    Occlusion site: M1 versus C14.661.61 to 13.52 0.0046
    Clot burden score‡
     CT, pts*1.231.00 to 1.50 0.046
     MRI, pts*1.261.07 to 1.47 0.0053
    HMCAS/SVS
     HMCAS: presence versus absence0.870.25 to 2.990.830.800.22 to 2.990.74
     SVS: presence versus absence0.840.40 to 1.770.657.891.65 to 37.780.0097
    FVH/DWI mismatch: yes versus no‡2.711.19 to 6.20 0.018
    ASPECT-FVH score, pts*‡1.090.93 to 1.270.31
    DWM Fazekas score, pts‡
     CT, pts*0.68<0.01 to >1000.99
     MRI, pts*0.790.56 to 1.100.16
    • 3-month excellent outcome after IVT defined by a 3-month mRS score ≤1.

    • All ORs are calculated for 3-month mRS score ≤2.

    • Bold values shows p<0.05.

    • *ORs express the risk variation for a unit increase of the variable.

    • †ORs express the risk variation for 10 mL increase in the ischaemic core volume on DWI.

    • ‡Nested effect is adjusted on the nesting characteristics, that is, imaging type, to consider effect differently in CT and in MRI.

    • ASPECTS-FVH score, Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT score and extent of FLAIR vascular hyperintensities (0–6); C1, distal internal carotid artery; clot burden score (0–10); DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; DWI volume, ischaemic core volume on DWI; DWM Fazekas score, deep white matter Fazekas score (0–3); FVH/DWI mismatch, FLAIR vascular hyperintensity and DWI infarct hyperintensity mismatch; HMCAS/SVS, hyper-dense MCA sign on CT or susceptibility vessel sign on T2*-MRI; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; M1, first segment of MCA; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke scale; OTT, onset-to-treatment time; pts, patients.

  • Table 3

    Association of 24-hour neurological improvement with 3-month outcome

    3-month mRS score 0–1 (n=76/230)
    AUC95% CISeSpPPVNPVOR*95% CIP valueOR†95% CIP value
    SNI: yes versus no0.760.71 to 0.820.570.960.880.8232.1412.63 to 81.76<0.000114.355.04 to 40.87<0.0001
    MNI: yes versus no0.820.76 to 0.870.780.860.730.8920.8210.31 to 42.07<0.000126.579.52 to 74.19<0.0001
    NINDS NI: yes versus no0.800.76 to 0.850.950.660.580.9635.3112.22 to 101.99<0.000129.828.85 to 100.51<0.0001
    ≥25% NI: yes versus no0.810.77 to 0.860.960.670.590.9749.1414.77 to 163.54<0.000135.509.59 to 131.38<0.0001
    ≥50% NI: yes versus no0.850.80 to 0.900.840.850.740.9130.3814.22 to 64.91<0.000120.578.45 to 50.05<0.0001
    Normalised change, %‡0.930.89 to 0.961.871.73 to 2.02<0.00011.791.65 to 1.93<0.0001
    • Normalised change, calculated as Embedded Image and as Embedded Image , if baseline NIHSS–24-hour NIHSS <0.

    • Statistical significance requires p<0.004 after Bonferroni correction.

    • *All ORs and AUC were estimated without adjustment to baseline explaining variables.

    • †All ORs and AUC were estimated with adjustment on baseline NIHSS, age, 24-hour ASPECT score and SITS-MOST haemorrhage classification, and on factors identified in the previously prediction model.

    • ‡OR express the risk variation for a 10% increase of the variable.

    • AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; MNI, major neurological improvement defined as 24-hour NIHSS score ≤1 or a 8-point improvement between baseline and 24-hour NIHSS; mRS, modified Rankin Scale (0–6); 3-month excellent outcome defined as mRS 0–1; ≥25% NI, 24-hour neurological improvement by at least 25% from baseline NIHSS; ≥50% NI, 24-hour neurological improvement by at least 50% from baseline NIHSS; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke scale; NINDS NI, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke neurological improvement defined as a 4-point improvement between baseline and 24-hour NIHSS; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; Se, sensitivity; SNI, strong neurological improvement defined as 24-hour NIHSS score ≤3; Sp, specificity.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 6 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis
Nolwenn Riou-Comte, Benjamin Gory, Marc Soudant, François Zhu, Yu Xie, Lisa Humbertjean, Gioia Mione, Catherine Oppenheim, Francis Guillemin, Serge Bracard, Sébastien Richard
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 631-639; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000852

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis
Nolwenn Riou-Comte, Benjamin Gory, Marc Soudant, François Zhu, Yu Xie, Lisa Humbertjean, Gioia Mione, Catherine Oppenheim, Francis Guillemin, Serge Bracard, Sébastien Richard
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 631-639; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000852
Download PDF

Share
Clinical imaging factors of excellent outcome after thrombolysis in large-vessel stroke: a THRACE subgroup analysis
Nolwenn Riou-Comte, Benjamin Gory, Marc Soudant, François Zhu, Yu Xie, Lisa Humbertjean, Gioia Mione, Catherine Oppenheim, Francis Guillemin, Serge Bracard, Sébastien Richard
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 631-639; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000852
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association