Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Neurological outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations in a prospective observational cohort and literature review

Da Li, Jing-Jie Zheng, Jian-Cong Weng, Pan-Pan Liu, Ze-Yu Wu, Li-Wei Zhang, Jun-Ting Zhang, Liang Wang, Zhen Wu
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000608 Published 24 December 2021
Da Li
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing-Jie Zheng
2 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian-Cong Weng
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pan-Pan Liu
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ze-Yu Wu
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li-Wei Zhang
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun-Ting Zhang
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Wang
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhen Wu
1 Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zhen Wu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Sankey diagrams showing the distribution and changes in mRS score at enrolment and at censoring time. (A) The figure consisted of two bars and one flow in between. These two bars show the distribution of mRS scores at enrolment and at censoring time in orange. The width and value of each flow were calculated according to the sample size showing the dominant or subordinate contributions to the overall flow that were similar in other panels. (B–D) The mRS scores at enrolment and at censoring time were stratified by the number of prospective haemorrhages (B), crossing the axial midpoint or not (C), and presence of DVA or not (D). The Sankey diagrams are illustrated using Tableau Desktop (V.8.3). DVA, developmental venous anomaly; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Boxplots showing the distribution of mRS scores at enrolment and at censoring time based on risk factors. (A) The boxplot shows the mRS score at censoring time stratified by mRS score at enrolment. (B–D) The outcome was significantly better in patients without prospective ictus than in patients with one (Z=−7.398, p<0.001) or more (Z=−5.414, p<0.001) ictus (B). Patients without lesions crossing the axial midpoint had significantly better outcomes than patients with lesions crossing the axial midpoint (Z=−6.352, p<0.001) (C). However, there was no significance between the outcomes in patients with or without DVA (Z=−0.384, p=0.701) (D). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Circles indicate the outliers; values in italic above the horizontal axis indicate the mean values of each boxplot. DVA, developmental venous anomaly; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Baseline and clinical data of brainstem cavernous malformations stratified by neurological outcome

    Variable (%)Overall, N=698Improved (mRS=0), n=334Unchanged, n=293Worsened, n=71P value
    Female321 (46.0)154 (46.1)132 (45.1)35 (49.3)0.811†
    Mean age at enrolment, years38.3±13.836.8±13.339.5±13.840.6±15.2 0.017*‡
    Hypertension96 (13.8)50 (15.0)38 (13.0)8 (11.3)0.625†
    Mean duration of symptoms, months21.3±44.716.4±37.924.5±46.330.8±62.5 0.013*‡
    Patients with prior haemorrhage680 (97.4)322 (96.4)288 (98.3)70 (98.6)0.267†
    Mean number of prior haemorrhage1.4±0.81.3±0.81.5±0.91.6±0.8 0.003*‡
    Haemorrhage at enrolment508 (72.8)228 (68.3)223 (76.1)57 (80.3) 0.029*†
    FND at enrolment589 (84.4)265 (79.3)262 (89.4)62 (87.3) 0.002*†
    Midbrain location154 (22.1)69 (20.7)65 (22.2)20 (28.2)0.699†
    Pontine location442 (63.3)216 (64.7)186 (63.5)40 (56.3)
    Medullary location102 (14.6)49 (14.7)42 (14.3)11 (15.5)
    Crossing axial midpoint174 (24.9)70 (21.0)71 (24.2)33 (46.5) <0.001*†
    Developmental venous anomaly237 (34.0)106 (31.7)98 (33.4)33 (46.5)0.057†
    Perilesional oedema342 (49.0)172 (51.5)132 (45.1)38 (53.5)0.198†
    Zabramski type I190 (27.2)97 (29.0)70 (23.9)23 (32.4) 0.010*†
    Zabramski type II326 (46.7)135 (40.4)156 (53.2)35 (49.3)
    Zabramski type III/IV182 (26.1)102 (30.5)67 (22.9)13 (18.3)
    Mean lesion size, cm¶1.5±0.71.4±0.61.6±0.61.9±0.7 <0.001*‡
    Size >1.5 cm299 (42.8)116 (34.7)135 (46.1)48 (67.6) <0.001*†
    Superficial-seated395 (56.6)173 (51.8)171 (58.4)51 (71.8) 0.003*†
    Moderate-seated208 (29.8)102 (30.5)93 (31.7)13 (18.3)
    Deep-seated95 (13.6)59 (17.7)29 (9.9)7 (9.9)
    mRS score at enrolment0.363§
     047 (6.7)41 (12.3)06 (8.5)
     1400 (57.3)153 (45.8)210 (71.7)37 (52.1)
     2104 (14.9)52 (15.6)38 (13.0)14 (19.7)
     366 (9.5)39 (11.7)17 (5.8)10 (14.1)
     468 (9.7)38 (11.4)26 (8.9)4 (5.6)
     513 (1.9)11 (3.3)2 (0.7)0
    mRS score at censored <0.001*§
     0233 (33.4)233 (69.8)00
     1283 (40.5)70 (21.0)210 (71.7)3 (4.2)
     271 (10.2)17 (5.1)38 (13.0)16 (22.5)
     344 (6.3)10 (3.0)17 (5.8)17 (23.9)
     449 (7.0)4 (1.2)26 (8.9)19 (26.8)
     56 (0.9)02 (0.7)4 (5.6)
     612 (1.7)0012 (16.9)
    Mean follow-up duration, months56.9±35.369.0±28.549.8±37.629.4±31.3 <0.001*‡
    Haemorrhage-free survival time, months48.7±36.061.4±32.241.9±36.617.0±21.0 <0.001*‡
    Patients with prospective bleeding167 (23.9)48 (14.4)56 (19.1)63 (88.7) <0.001*†
    Mean number of prospective bleeding0.3±0.70.2±0.50.3±0.61.2±0.8 <0.001*‡
    Patients under observation514 (73.6)301 (90.1)188 (64.2)25 (35.2) <0.001*†
    Patients receiving radiosurgery14 (2.0)5 (1.5)7 (2.4)2 (2.8)
    Patients receiving surgery170 (24.4)28 (8.4)98 (33.4)44 (62.0)
    • Means are given with SD.

    • Bold indicates statistical significance.

    • *P<0.05.

    • †χ2 test.

    • ‡One-way analysis of variance.

    • §Kruskal-Wallis test.

    • ¶Lesion size was expressed as the lesion equivalent diameter (abc)1/3, where a, b and c represent the maximal diameters (length, width and height) measured on axial, sagittal and coronal MRI scans.

    • FND, focal neurological deficit; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.

  • Table 2

    Risk factors for worsened neurological function in brainstem cavernous malformations

    Variable (%)nWorsened (n=71, %)Univariate†
    RR (95% CI)
    P valueMultivariate†‡
    RR (95% CI)
    P value
    Male37736 (9.5)ReferenceReference
    Female32135 (10.9)1.159 (0.709 to 1.894)0.5551.074 (0.634 to 1.819)0.792
    Age (per 1 year)1.014 (0.995 to 1.032)0.1451.020 (1.000 to 1.041)0.051
    Without hypertension60263 (10.5)Reference
    Hypertension968 (8.3)0.778 (0.360 to 1.679)0.522
    Duration of symptoms (per 0.1 months)1.004 (1.000 to 1.008)0.0641.004 (0.999 to 1.009)0.101
    Without prior haemorrhage181 (5.6)Reference
    With prior haemorrhage68070 (10.3)1.951 (0.256 to 14.882)0.519
    Without haemorrhage at enrolment19014 (7.4)Reference
    Haemorrhage at enrolment50857 (11.2)1.589 (0.863 to 2.924)0.137
    Without FND at enrolment1099 (8.3)Reference
    FND at enrolment58962 (10.5)1.307 (0.629 to 2.715)0.473
    mRS score at enrolment (per one score)0.939 (0.756 to 1.168)0.573
    Lesion size (per 1 mm) 2.343 (1.643 to 3.341) <0.001*1.263 (0.806 to 1.979)0.309
    Not crossing axial midpoint52438 (7.3)ReferenceReference
    Crossing axial midpoint17433 (19.0) 2.993 (1.811 to 4.948) <0.001* 2.325 (1.332 to 4.060) 0.003*
    Without venous anomaly46138 (8.2)ReferenceReference
    Developmental venous anomaly23733 (13.9) 1.801 (1.097 to 2.955) 0.020* 1.776 (1.037 to 3.041) 0.036*
    Depth (superficial-seated)39551 (12.9) 1.595 (1.074 to 2.367) 0.021*1.194 (0.774 to 1.841)0.423
    Without oedema35633 (9.3)Reference
    Perilesional oedema34238 (11.1)1.223 (0.748 to 2.001)0.422
    Zabramski classification1.313 (0.935 to 1.846)0.116
     Type III/IV18213 (7.1)Reference
     Type II32635 (10.7)1.564 (0.805 to 3.038)0.187
     Type I19023 (12.1)1.790 (0.878 to 3.652)1.790
    • Bold indicates statistical significance.

    • *P<0.05.

    • †Binary logistic regression (method: Enter); risk factors, entered into the multivariate binary logistic regression, included gender, age, duration of symptoms, lesion size, crossing axial midpoint, developmental venous anomaly and depth of the lesion.

    • ‡Adjustment for duration of follow-up.

    • FND, focal neurological deficit; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; RR, relative risk.

  • Table 3

    Neurological outcome of untreated brainstem CMs

    Study and yearStudy typePatients (n)Mean age, yearsMean follow-up, yearsPatients with prospective ictus (%)Total number of ictusAnnual haemorrhage rate, %Neurological outcome (%)
    Zimmerman et al 199130 Retrospective8NA3–60 months1 (12.5)1NA7 (87.5) minor symptoms or asymptomatic; 1 (12.5) died of haemorrhage.
    Fritschi et al 199426 Retrospective30NA3.0NANANA13 (43.3) normal; 7 mildly, 2 moderately and 2 severely disabled; 6 (20.0) died of CMs.
    Bouillot et al 199629 Retrospective7NA5.6NANA11.71 (14.3) improved; 4 (57.1) same; 2 (28.6) worsened.
    Porter et al 199920 Retrospective12NANANANANA7 (58.3) improved/same; 5 (41.7) worsened; 1 (8.3) died of rebleeding.
    Kupersmith et al 200112 Retrospective3737.54.97 (18.9)85.118 (48.6) improved; 14 (37.8) same; 3 (8.1) worsened; 2 (5.4) died of myocardial infarction.
    Esposito et al 200332 Retrospective17NANANANA2.511 (64.7) favourable; 5 (29.4) same; 1 (5.9) worsened.
    Tarnaris et al 200828 Retrospective1537.96.14 (26.7)44.42 (13.3) improved; 5 (33.3) same; 8 (53.3) worsened; mean mRS score 2.07.
    Bhardwaj et al 200931 Retrospective13‡12.74.41 (7.7)1≈1.74 (30.8) improved; 8 (61.5) same (6 asymptomatic, 2 symptomatic); 1 (7.7) died.
    Chen et al 201121 Retrospective2038.13.77 (35.0)≥11NAMean NIHSS score 1.7.
    Menon et al 201127 Retrospective29†NA4.017 (63.0)≥41≥35.314 (51.9) improved/same; 13 (48.1) worsened; 1 (3.7) died of haemorrhage.
    Al-Holou et al 20128 Retrospective15 lesNA≈3.55 les (33.3)8≈15.2 per lesNA
    Al-Shahi Salman et al 20122 Prospective14NA5.0NANANA8 patients (57.1) had a second haemorrhage or focal neurological deficit.
    Li et al 201417 Prospective8512.74.737 (43.5)4711.722 (25.9) normal; 33 (38.8) improved; 32 (37.6) same; 20 (23.5) worsened.
    Li et al 201417 Prospective33136.26.5131 (39.6)18513.695 (28.7) normal; 198 (59.8) improved; 109 (32.9) same; 24 (7.3) worsened; 3 (0.9) deaths.
    Gross et al 20165 Retrospective18 lesionNA3.3NA1016.7 per lesionPermanent neurological morbidity of 45% for brainstem, thalamic and basal ganglia CMs.
    Horne et al 20163 Meta-analysis575NANA139 (24.2)139NANA
    Zuurbier et al 201914 Prospective34NANANA15NA15 events of haemorrhage or persistent or progressive focal neurological deficit.
    Present seriesProspective69838.34.7167 (23.9)2226.7233 (33.4) normal; 334 (47.9) improved/mRS=0, 293 (42.0) same; 71 (10.2) worsened.
    • *Two patients were lost to follow-up; 5 had one haemorrhage and 12 had more than two haemorrhages during follow-up.

    • †Seven patients had previous radiotherapy and one patient died of medulloblastoma.

    • CMs, cavernous malformations; les, lesions; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NA, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000608supp001.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 6 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neurological outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations in a prospective observational cohort and literature review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Neurological outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations in a prospective observational cohort and literature review
Da Li, Jing-Jie Zheng, Jian-Cong Weng, Pan-Pan Liu, Ze-Yu Wu, Li-Wei Zhang, Jun-Ting Zhang, Liang Wang, Zhen Wu
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 501-510; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Neurological outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations in a prospective observational cohort and literature review
Da Li, Jing-Jie Zheng, Jian-Cong Weng, Pan-Pan Liu, Ze-Yu Wu, Li-Wei Zhang, Jun-Ting Zhang, Liang Wang, Zhen Wu
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 501-510; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000608
Download PDF

Share
Neurological outcomes of untreated brainstem cavernous malformations in a prospective observational cohort and literature review
Da Li, Jing-Jie Zheng, Jian-Cong Weng, Pan-Pan Liu, Ze-Yu Wu, Li-Wei Zhang, Jun-Ting Zhang, Liang Wang, Zhen Wu
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2021, 6 (4) 501-510; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000608
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Patients and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association