Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis

Choon Han Tan, Andrew GR Wu, Ching-Hui Sia, Aloysius ST Leow, Bernard PL Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard LL Yeo, Benjamin YQ Tan
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000737 Published 28 September 2021
Choon Han Tan
1 Department of Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Choon Han Tan
Andrew GR Wu
2 Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ching-Hui Sia
3 Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ching-Hui Sia
Aloysius ST Leow
4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aloysius ST Leow
Bernard PL Chan
4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vijay Kumar Sharma
2 Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vijay Kumar Sharma
Leonard LL Yeo
2 Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leonard LL Yeo
Benjamin YQ Tan
2 Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
4 Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benjamin YQ Tan
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Forest plot depicting risk of ischaemic stroke recurrence. ASA, aspirin; CIL, cilostazol; CLO, clopidogrel; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Forest plot depicting risk of any stroke recurrence. ASA, aspirin; CIL, cilostazol; CLO, clopidogrel; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Forest plot depicting risk of intracranial haemorrhage. ASA, aspirin; CIL, cilostazol; CLO, clopidogrel; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Forest plot depicting risk of major haemorrhagic events. ASA, aspirin; CIL, cilostazol; CLO, clopidogrel; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Forest plot depicting risk of mortality. ASA, aspirin; CIL, cilostazol; CLO, clopidogrel; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Characteristics of included studies

    Study IDCountrySample size, ITT (% male)Age (intervention)Age (control)InterventionControl
    Aoki 2019 (ADS)*22 Japan1201 (66%)69 (IQR 60–77)69 (IQR 61–78)Cilostazol 200 mg + aspirin 81–200 mgAspirin 81–200 mg
    Blair 2019 (LACI-1)23 UK57 (68%)Mean of all participants: 66.1 (11.1)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin/clopidogrelAspirin/clopidogrel
    Gotoh 2000 (CSPS)24 Japan1067 (66%)65.2 (8.7)65.1 (8.8)Cilostazol 100 mg BDPlacebo
    Guo 200925 China68 (35%)59.44 (10.63)62.02 (11.12)Cilostazol 100 mg BDAspirin 100 mg
    Han 2013 (ECLIPse)26 Korea182 (25%)64.63 (9.07)65.48 (9.92)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin 100 mgAspirin 100 mg
    Huang 2008 (CASISP)27 China719 (69%)60.14 (10.05)60.31 (9.71)CilostazolAspirin
    Johkura 201228 Japan106 (43%)76.7 (9.8)73.7 (9.4)Cilostazol 200 mgAspirin 100 mg
    Kim 2018 (PICASSO)29 South Korea, Hong Kong, Philippines1534 (62%)65.5 (10.9)65.8 (10.7)Cilostazol 100 mg BDAspirin 100 mg
    Kwon 2005 (TOSS)30 South Korea135 (61%)62.28 (10.42)62.54 (8.97)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin 100 mgAspirin 100 mg
    Kwon 2011 (TOSS-2)31 4 East Asian countries457 (51%)66.42 (11.33)64.58 (11.11)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin 75–150 mgClopidogrel 75 mg + aspirin 75–150 mg
    Lee 2011 (CAIST)32 Korea458 (61%)63 (12)63 (12)Cilostazol 200 mgAspirin 300 mg
    Lee 201733 Korea80 (65%)57.4 (12.7)59.5 (11.7)Cilostazol 100 mg BDAspirin 100 mg
    Nakamura 201234 Japan76 (74%)66 (12)67 (10)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin 300 mgAspirin 300 mg
    Ohnuki 201735 Japan24 (71%)60.5 (10)63.6 (9.1)Cilostazol 200 mg + aspirin 100 mgAspirin 100 mg
    Shimizu 201336 Japan507 (67%)66.2 (9.4)66.6 (8.9)Cilostazol 200 mg + optimal medical treatmentOptimal medical treatment
    Shinohara 2010 (CSPS 2)37 Japan2716 (72%)63.5 (9.2)63.4 (9.0)Cilostazol 100 mg BDAspirin 81 mg
    Toyoda 2019 (CSPS.com)38 Japan1879 (70%)69.6 (9.2)69.7 (9.2)Cilostazol 100 mg BD + aspirin 81–100 mg/ clopidogrel 50–75 mgAspirin 81–100 mg/ clopidogrel 50–75 mg
    Uchiyama 2015 (CATHARSIS)39 Japan163 (66%)68.3 (range 45–84)68.3 (range 50–82)Cilostazol 200 mg + aspirin 100 mgAspirin 100 mg
    • All data are in mean (SD) or median (IQR/range).

    • *After 14 days, both arms were swapped to cilostazol 200 mg until 3 months. Where possible, we analysed data at 14 days instead of 3 months.

    • ITT, intention to treat.

  • Table 2

    Details of included studies

    Study IDTime to randomisation/treatmentDuration of treatment/ follow-upType of stroke
    CilostazolControl
    Aoki 2019 (ADS)22 Within 48 hours
    Cilostazol: 10.1 hours (IQR 4.6–20.0)
    Control: 11.5 hours (IQR 4.8–20.9)
    14 days, 3 months Symptomatic ICAS (23%)
    Large-artery atherosclerosis (13%),
    LACI (46%), branch atheromatous disease (13%)
    Symptomatic ICAS (22%)
    Large-artery atherosclerosis (15%),
    LACI (43%), branch atheromatous disease (16%)
    Blair 2019 (LACI-1)23 Within 4 years
    Median: 203 days (range 6–920)
    Treatment: 6–9 weeks
    Follow-up: 11 weeks
    LACILACI
    Gotoh 2000 (CSPS)24 1–6 months
    Cilostazol: 83.0 days (range 7–1805)
    Control: 82.4 days (range 8–1079)
    Mean follow-up duration:
    Cilostazol: 651.8 days
    Control: 569.7 days
    Treatment duration:
    Cilostazol: 632.2 (467.7) days Control: 695.1 (456.3) days
    Atherothrombotic (14.1%), LACI (75.0%), mixed (9.0%)Atherothrombotic (13.1%), LACI (73.8%), mixed (11.4%)
    Guo 200925 1–6 months 12 months  
    Han 2013 (ECLIPse)26 Within 7 days
    Median: 5 days (78.3% of patients were randomised within 7 days)
    90 daysLACILACI
    Huang 2008 (CASISP)27 1–6 months
    Cilostazol: 77.26 (50.05) days
    Control: 79.72 (51.96) days
    12–18 months (average: 740 person-years)  
    Johkura 201228 1–6 months 6 months  
    Kim 2018 (PICASSO)*29 Within 180 days
    Cilostazol: 18 days (IQR 8–40)
    Control: 17 days (IQR 7–35)
    1.9 years (IQR 1.0–3.0)Ischaemic stroke (95%), TIA (5%)Ischaemic stroke (94%), TIA (6%)
    Kwon 2005 (TOSS)30 Within 2 weeks 6 monthsICASICAS
    Kwon 2011 (TOSS-2)31 Within 2 weeks
    Cilostazol: 8.03 (3.34) days
    Control: 7.82 (3.15) days
    7 monthsICASICAS
    Lee 2011 (CAIST)32 Within 48 hours
    Cilostazol: 33 (12) hours
    Control: 35 (11) hours
    90 daysLarge-artery disease (32%), small-vessel disease (55%), cardioembolism (1%), other determined aetiology (<1%), undetermined (12%)Large-artery disease (25%), small-vessel disease (62%), cardioembolism (1%), other determined aetiology (<1%), undetermined (12%)
    Lee 201733 Within 7 days 3 monthsAtherosclerosis (9.4%), small-artery disease (87.5%), TIA (3.1%)Atherosclerosis (2.9%), small-artery disease (87.5%), TIA (5.9%), unknown (8.8%)
    Nakamura 201234 Within 48 hours
    Cilostazol: 25 (12) hours
    Control: 23 (14) hours
    6 monthsLarge-artery atherosclerosis (21%), small-vessel occlusion (47%), other determined or undetermined aetiology (32%)Large-artery atherosclerosis (18%), small-vessel occlusion (47%), other determined or undetermined aetiology (34%)
    Ohnuki 201735 Within 7 days 4 weeksAtherothrombosis (15%), LACI (62%), TIA (8%), unknown (15%)Atherothrombosis (45%), LACI (45%), TIA (9%)
    Shimizu 201336 Within 24 hours 3 monthsAtherothrombotic (30.7%), LACI (64.1%), others (5.2%)Atherothrombotic (25.0%), LACI (70.7%), others (4.3%)
    Shinohara 2010 (CSPS 2)37 Within 26 weeks (6 months)1–5 years
    Mean: 29 (16) months
    Atherothrombotic (33%), LACI (65%), others (3%)Atherothrombotic (31%), LACI (65%), others (3%)
    Toyoda 2019 (CSPS.com)†38 8–180 days
    Cilostazol: 27 days (IQR 13–63)
    Control: 25 days (IQR 13–64)
    0.5–3.5 years
    Median: 1.4 (IQR 0.8–2.2)
    ICAS (30%), ECAS (12%)
    Atherothrombotic (42%), LACI (50%), others/unknown (8%)
    ICAS (29%), ECAS (14%)
    Atherothrombotic (42%), LACI (49%), others/unknown (9%)
    Uchiyama 2015 (CATHARSIS)39 2 weeks to 6 months 2 years
    Mean: 762 days
    ICASICAS
    • Data are in median (IQR), mean (range) or mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.

    • *Only patients with asymptomatic or previous intracerebral haemorrhage were included.

    • †Only patients with high-risk ischaemic stroke were included.

    • ICAS, intracranial arterial stenosis; LACI, lacunar infarction; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

  • Table 3

    Summary of outcomes

    SubgroupNCilostazolControlRR (95% CI)P valueI2 (%)Test for subgroup differences
    Ischaemic stroke recurrence
     AOverall18217/5724317/57050.69 (0.58–0.81)<0.00010NA
     BCIL SAPT vs SAPT7131/2844168/28370.78 (0.62–0.97)0.030χ3 2=7.50, p=0.06, I2=60.0%
    CIL DAPT vs SAPT843/186482/18530.52 (0.36–0.75)0.00050
    CIL DAPT vs DAPT110/2326/2251.62 (0.60–4.37)0.34NA
    CIL vs No CIL233/78461/7900.54 (0.36–0.82)0.0030
     CStroke onset <3 days416/112024/11220.67 (0.36–1.25)0.200χ1 2=0.01, p=0.93, I2=0%
    Stroke onset >3 days14201/4604293/45830.69 (0.56–0.84)0.00028
     DShort term (<3 months)37/6558/6270.78 (0.29–2.12)0.630χ1 2=0.07, p=0.80, I2=0%
    Long term (≥3 months)15210/5069309/50780.68 (0.58–0.81)<0.00010
     ESymptomatic ICAS314/38212/3731.10 (0.45–2.68)0.8424χ2 2=1.33, p=0.52, I2=0%
    LACI22/1311/1081.08 (0.14–8.56)0.950
    Others/mixed/unknown13201/5211304/52240.67 (0.56–0.79)<0.000010
    Any stroke recurrence
     AOverall18250/5724394/57050.64 (0.54–0.74)<0.000010NA
     BStroke onset <3 days420/112029/11220.70 (0.39–1.23)0.210χ1 2=0.11, p=0.75, I2=0%
    Stroke onset >3 days14230/4604365/45830.63 (0.54–0.74)<0.000010
     CShort term (<3 months)39/6559/6270.91 (0.37–2.24)0.830χ1 2=0.61, p=0.43, I2=0%
    Long term (≥3 months)15241/5069385/50780.63 (0.54–0.74)<0.000010
     DSymptomatic ICAS315/38214/3730.96 (0.27–3.45)0.9565χ2 2=0.71, p=0.70, I2=0%
    LACI22/1311/1081.08 (0.14–8.56)0.950
    Others/mixed/unknown13233/5211379/52240.62 (0.53–0.73)<0.000010
    Intracranial haemorrhage
     AOverall1837/572486/57050.46 (0.31–0.68)<0.00010NA
     BStroke onset <3 days44/11205/11220.91 (0.24–3.53)0.890χ1 2=1.05, p=0.31, I2=4.8%
    Stroke onset >3 days1433/460481/45830.43 (0.29–0.65)<0.00010
     CShort term (<3 months)32/6551/6272.00 (0.18–22.03)0.57NAχ1 2=1.48, p=0.22, I2=32.3%
    Long term (≥3 months)1535/506985/50780.44 (0.30–0.66)<0.00010
     DSymptomatic ICAS31/3823/3730.46 (0.06–3.57)0.460χ1 2=0.00, p=1.00, I2=0%
    LACI20/1310/108NANANA
    Others/mixed/unknown1336/521183/52240.46 (0.31–0.68)0.00010
    Major haemorrhagic events
     AOverall1444/403193/40100.49 (0.34–0.70)<0.00010NA
     BStroke onset <3 days47/112013/11220.60 (0.24–1.52)0.280χ1 2=0.23, p=0.63, I2=0%
    Stroke onset >3 days1037/291180/28880.47 (0.32–0.69)0.00010
     CShort term (<3 months)34/6555/6270.80 (0.22–2.97)0.74NAχ1 2=0.59, p=0.44, I2=0%
    Long term (≥3 months)1140/337688/33830.47 (0.32–0.68)<0.00010
     DSymptomatic ICAS36/3829/3730.67 (0.17–2.59)0.5637χ1 2=0.24, p=0.62, I2=0%
    LACI20/1310/108NANANA
    Others/mixed/unknown938/351884/35290.47 (0.32–0.68)<0.00010
    Mortality
     AOverall1564/502972/50170.90 (0.64–1.25)0.530NA
     BStroke onset <3 days23/4821/4832.33 (0.34–15.82)0.390χ1 2=0.98, p=0.32, I2=0%
    Stroke onset >3 days1361/454771/45340.87 (0.62–1.22)0.430
     CShort term (<3 months)20/550/26NANANANA
    Long term (≥3 months)1364/497472/49910.90 (0.64–1.25)0.530
     DSymptomatic ICAS32/3823/3730.67 (0.11–4.06)0.660χ1 2=0.11, p=0.74, I2=0%
    LACI20/1310/108NANANA
    Others/mixed/unknown1062/451669/45360.91 (0.65–1.27)0.580
    MACE
     AOverall13184/3826276/38420.67 (0.56–0.81)<0.00010NA
     BStroke onset <3 days425/112033/11220.76 (0.45–1.27)0.300χ1 2=0.18, p=0.67, I2=0%
    Stroke onset >3 days9159/2706243/27200.67 (0.52–0.86)0.00220
     CShort term (<3 months)212/61312/6121.00 (0.45–2.21)1.00NAχ1 2=1.03, p=0.31, I2=3.0%
    Long term (≥3 months)11172/3213264/32300.66 (0.55–0.79)<0.00010
     DSymptomatic ICAS217/29912/2931.38 (0.67–2.85)0.380χ2 2=4.22, p=0.12, I2=52.6%
    LACI11/891/931.04 (0.07–16.45)0.98NA
    Others/mixed/unknown10166/3438263/34560.64 (0.53–0.77)<0.000010
    • CIL, cilostazol; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; ICAS, intracranial arterial stenosis; LACI, lacunar infarction; No CIL, placebo or best medical therapy; RR, risk ratio; SAPT, single antiplatelet therapy.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000737supp001.pdf]

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    • Data supplement 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 3 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 6 (3)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Choon Han Tan, Andrew GR Wu, Ching-Hui Sia, Aloysius ST Leow, Bernard PL Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard LL Yeo, Benjamin YQ Tan
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Sep 2021, 6 (3) 410-423; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000737

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Choon Han Tan, Andrew GR Wu, Ching-Hui Sia, Aloysius ST Leow, Bernard PL Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard LL Yeo, Benjamin YQ Tan
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Sep 2021, 6 (3) 410-423; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000737
Download PDF

Share
Cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Choon Han Tan, Andrew GR Wu, Ching-Hui Sia, Aloysius ST Leow, Bernard PL Chan, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Leonard LL Yeo, Benjamin YQ Tan
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Sep 2021, 6 (3) 410-423; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000737
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Data availability statement
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association