Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial

Dapeng Mo, Baixue Jia, Huaizhang Shi, Yaxuan Sun, Qingan Liu, Chengzhe Fan, Jianping Deng, Jinglin Yuan, Wei Wu, Changchun Jiang, Guilian Zhang, Hanjun Du, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Xuan Sun, Ligang Song, Lian Liu, Guangge Peng, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000391 Published 25 March 2021
Dapeng Mo
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dapeng Mo
Baixue Jia
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huaizhang Shi
2 Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaxuan Sun
3 Neurology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingan Liu
4 Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Fourth Hospital, Harbin, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chengzhe Fan
5 Neurology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianping Deng
6 Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinglin Yuan
7 Neurology, Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei Wu
8 Neurology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Changchun Jiang
9 Neurology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guilian Zhang
10 Neurology, Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanjun Du
11 Neurology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ning Ma
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Gao
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuan Sun
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ligang Song
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lian Liu
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guangge Peng
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongjun Wang
12 China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
13 Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yilong Wang
12 China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
13 Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhongrong Miao
1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zhongrong Miao
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Study flowchart for patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion. CAS, carotid artery stenting; ITT, intent-to-treat; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PP, per-protocol; SAP, staged angioplasty.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Table 1

    Characteristics of patients at baseline

    CharacteristicsOverall
    (n=64)
    TreatmentP value
    SAP
    (n=33)
    Regular CAS
    (n=31)
    Age, year, median (IQR)66±7.465±7.167±1.60.32
    Female, n (%)12 (18.8)7 (21.2)5 (16.1)0.60
    Risk factors, n (%)
     Hypertension48 (75.0)23 (69.7)25 (80.6)0.31
     Diabetes23 (35.9)15 (45.5)8 (25.8)0.10
     Dyslipidaemia27 (42.2)13 (39.4)14 (45.2)0.64
     Previous ischaemic stroke19 (29.7)9 (27.3)10 (32.3)0.66
     Coronary heart disease12 (18.8)6 (18.2)6 (19.4)0.90
     Current or previous smoking35 (54.7)15 (45.4)20 (64.5)0.12
     Moderate to heavy alcohol24 (37.5)11 (33.3)13 (41.9)0.48
    Index events, n (%)0.07
     Ischaemic stroke44 (68.8)26 (78.8)18 (58.1)
     TIA20 (31.3)7 (21.2)13 (41.9)
    Duration from last symptom to randomisation, day, median (IQR)17 (5-35)19 (6–40)17 (5-34)0.77
    mRS, n (%)0.35
     023 (35.9)9 (27.3)14 (45.2)
     125 (39.1)14 (42.4)11 (35.5)
     214 (21.9)8 (24.2)6 (19.3)
     31 (1.6)1 (3.0)0 (0.0)
     41 (1.6)1 (3.0)0 (0.0)
    Systolic pressure, mm Hg, mean±SD138±21.0137±20.0140±22.00.65
    Mean systolic pressure during the operation, mm Hg, mean±SD129±12.8130±14.1128±11.50.51
    NIHSS, median (IQR)0 (0–2)1 (0–3)0 (0–1)0.16
    Stenosis degree, %, mean±SD92.3±4.192.4±4.091.6±4.20.43
    Lesion length, mm15.9±7.614.9±8.517.0±6.60.28
    CT perfusion, n (%)49 (76.6)27 (81.8)22 (71.0)0.31
    Concentricity, n (%)0.43
     Concentric12 (18.8)8 (24.2)4 (12.9)
     Moderately eccentric29 (45.3)15 (45.5)14 (45.2)
     Extremely eccentric23 (35.9)10 (30.3)13 (41.9)
    • CAS, carotid artery stenting; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; SAP, staged angioplasty; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.

  • Table 2

    Characteristics of patients during perioperative period

    VariableSAP (n=26)Regular CAS (n=30)P value
    First stage
     Periprocedural BP, mm Hg, mean±SD
      Preprocedural SBP141.46±18.33138.97±22.360.74
      Preprocedural DBP80.31±10.6676.80±11.850.32
      Postprocedural SBP130.00±22.09115.43±20.490.01
      Postprocedural DBP73.54±10.0167.13±14.640.15
     Max balloon diameter in mm, median (IQR)3.00 (2.50–3.00)4.00 (4.00–4.50)<0.01
     MLD, %, mean±SD
      Preprocedure89.48±17.0992.32±2.980.85
      Postprocedure61.80±19.7223.42±16.16<0.01
     Preprocedural time of DSA agent from carotid to capillary, mean±SD4.61±2.194.96±1.740.26
     Postprocedural time of DSA agent from carotid to capillary, mean±SD3.55±1.513.60±1.620.78
    Second stage
     Periprocedural BP, mm Hg, mean±SD
      Preprocedural SBP136.48±13.78––
      Preprocedural DBP81.12±10.65––
      Postprocedural SBP113.35±20.61––
      Postprocedural DBP67.69±14.69––
     Max balloon diameter in mm, median (IQR)4.00 (4.00–5.00)––
     MLD, %, mean±SD
      Preprocedure61.80±19.72––
      Postprocedure18.11±14.56––
     Preprocedural time of DSA agent from carotid to capillary, mean±SD3.88±1.66––
     Postprocedural time of DSA agent from carotid to capillary, mean±SD3.42±1.37––
    • BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; MLD, minimum lumen diameter; SAP, staged angioplasty; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

  • Table 3

    Characteristics of patients with hyperperfusion syndrome or intracerebral haemorrhage

    VariableCase no.
    123
    Index eventStrokeStrokeStroke
    Duration from quality event to randomisation, day304776
    Baseline mRS221
    Baseline NIHSS340
    Lesion Characteristics
     Stenosis degree, %93.190.792.0
     Length, mm10.419.222.5
     ConcentricityExtremely eccentricExtremely eccentricExtremely eccentric
    Residual stenosis degree, %21.328.922.1
    Time of symptom onset11 hours after the procedure24 hours after the procedure12 hours after the procedure
    SymptomsHeadache, confusion, left limb weaknessHeadache, nauseaHeadache, right limb weakness
    HPS or ICHHPS HPS ICH
    TreatmentStrict control of blood pressure, sedation, administration of mannitol
    mRS at 30 days421
    • HPS, hyperperfusion syndrome; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

  • Table 4

    Outcomes of primary endpoint and secondary endpoints from the treatment groups in ITT population

    OutcomesTreatmentRisk difference (95% CI)Relative risk (95% CI)P value
    SAP (n=33)Regular CAS (n=31)
    Primary endpoint0 (0.0)3 (9.7)−9.7 (−20.1 to 0.7)NA0.11
    Secondary endpoints  
     HPP0 (0.0)7 (22.6)−22.6 (−36.8 to −10.2)NA0.04
     Procedure-related adverse events1 (3.0)2 (6.5)−3.5 (−13.9 to 6.9)0.64 (0.13 to 3.21)0.61
     Myocardial infarction1 (3.0)1 (3.2)−0.2 (−0.86 to 0.82)0.97 (0.24 to 3.96)1.00
     Haemorrhage 30 days to 1 year0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NANA1.00
     Death at 30 days0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NANA1.00
     Stroke resulting in deformity0 (0.0)0 (0.0)NANA1.00
    • CAS, carotid artery stenting; HPP, hyperperfusion phenomenon; ITT, intent-to-treat; SAP, staged angioplasty.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary data

    [svn-2020-000391supp001.pdf]

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 6 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 6 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial
Dapeng Mo, Baixue Jia, Huaizhang Shi, Yaxuan Sun, Qingan Liu, Chengzhe Fan, Jianping Deng, Jinglin Yuan, Wei Wu, Changchun Jiang, Guilian Zhang, Hanjun Du, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Xuan Sun, Ligang Song, Lian Liu, Guangge Peng, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Mar 2021, 6 (1) 95-102; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000391

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial
Dapeng Mo, Baixue Jia, Huaizhang Shi, Yaxuan Sun, Qingan Liu, Chengzhe Fan, Jianping Deng, Jinglin Yuan, Wei Wu, Changchun Jiang, Guilian Zhang, Hanjun Du, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Xuan Sun, Ligang Song, Lian Liu, Guangge Peng, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Mar 2021, 6 (1) 95-102; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000391
Download PDF

Share
Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial
Dapeng Mo, Baixue Jia, Huaizhang Shi, Yaxuan Sun, Qingan Liu, Chengzhe Fan, Jianping Deng, Jinglin Yuan, Wei Wu, Changchun Jiang, Guilian Zhang, Hanjun Du, Ning Ma, Feng Gao, Xuan Sun, Ligang Song, Lian Liu, Guangge Peng, Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Mar 2021, 6 (1) 95-102; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2020-000391
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Learning curve and embolisation strategy in single-stage surgery combined embolisation and microsurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: results from a nationwide multicentre prospective registry study
  • Stepwise improvement in intracerebral haematoma expansion prediction with advanced imaging: a comprehensive comparison of existing scores
  • Thrombus iodine-based perviousness is associated with recanalisation and functional outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association