Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Design of trials in lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease: review and experience with the LACunar Intervention Trial 2 (LACI-2)

Gordon Blair, Jason P Appleton, Iris Mhlanga, Lisa J Woodhouse, Fergus Doubal, Philip M Bath, Joanna M Wardlaw
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-003022 Published 30 December 2024
Gordon Blair
1 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason P Appleton
2 Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
3 Stroke, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason P Appleton
Iris Mhlanga
2 Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa J Woodhouse
2 Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa J Woodhouse
Fergus Doubal
1 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fergus Doubal
Philip M Bath
2 Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip M Bath
Joanna M Wardlaw
1 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joanna M Wardlaw
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The ‘inverted pyramid of perfection’ in trial recruitment and follow-up: effect of increasing levels of selection and follow-up methods on participant numbers and generalisability. cSVD, cerebral small vessel disease.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Number of participants randomised and follow-up rate achieved in example randomised controlled trial’s that used clinical or imaging outcomes.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Comparison of clinical and imaging outcomes in trials with an imaging substudy.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Exemplar randomised controlled trials, and substudies where relevant, targeting people with cerebral small vessel disease including those with lacunar infarcts, white matter hyperintensities or sporadic intracerebral haemorrhage

    InterventionTrialTarget populationNOutcomeFU (months)Comment
    Pharmacotherapy
    Anti-inflammatory, minocyclineMINERVA69 LACI and WMH44BBB permeability, microglia activation3Completed
    Antiplatelet, dual vs monoSPS-36 LACI (on MRI)2916CASI60Neutral
    BP lowering, perindopril±indapamidePROGRESS70 Stroke (IS, ICH)6105Dementia, cognitive decline47Dementia/cognitive decline reduced
    PROGRESS47 71 Stroke (IS, ICH)192WMH36WMH progression reduced
    BP lowering, telmisartanPRoFESS54 Stroke (IS)771WMH28Neutral (but no BP difference)
    BP lowering, intense v guidelineINFINITY43 WMH199Gait speed
    WMH
    36Neutral
    Reduced
    LEOPOLD (NCT02472028)cSVD820WMH36Ongoing
    PODCAST72 IS, ICH83ACE-R6–30Neutral
    PRESERVE44 LACI+WMH62/111Cerebral perfusion3Neutral
    PRESERVE73 LACI+WMH111White matter diffusivity, cognition24Neutral (SBP −6.8 mm Hg)
    PROHIBIT-ICH (ISRCTN23416732)ICH112MoCA12Ongoing
    SPRINT-MIND74 Hypertension (no diabetes/stroke)9361Dementia, cognitive impairment40Neutral, but less cognitive impairment
    SPRINT-MIND50 Hypertension (no diabetes/stroke)454WMH48Less increase in WMH volume, and more decrease in total brain volume (but diuretic effect?)
    SPS-36 LACI (on MRI)2916CASI60Neutral
    GABA partial agonist (tramiprosate)(NCT00056238)CAA24Microbleeds3Neutral
    Lipid lowering, pravastatinPROSPER52 Vascular risk factors535New infarcts, WMH33Neutral
    Lipid lowering, intense v guidelinePODCAST75 IS77ACE-R6–30Neutral. Post hoc analysis positive75
    Neurotransmission modulators (DL-3-n-butylphthalide)(ChiCTR-TRC-09000440)76 cSVD+VCI281ADAS-cog, CIBIC-plus5.5Cognition and global functioning improved
    Nitric oxide donor (ISMN)LACI-111 35 77 LACISafety, tolerability2Safe, tolerable
    LACI-210 LACI363Feasibility12Composite, cognition, function
    PDE3-I (cilostazol)ECLIPSE78 Acute LACI130Pulsatility index, WMH3Reduced pulsatility index. Neutral for WMH
    LACI-111 35 77 LACISafety, tolerability2Safe, tolerable, WMH reduced
    LACI-210 LACI363Feasibility12Composite, cognition, function
    Lee et al 79 AD with WMH36WMH6Improved regional cerebral metabolism
    PDE5-I (tadalafil)PASTIS80 LACI/TIA+lacunes/WMH55Change in CBFSingle doseNon-significant increase in CBF
    Uric acid lowering (allopurinol)XILO-FIST81 IS/TIA464WMH24Neutral, safe
    Device
    Remote ischaemic conditioningLiao82 Subcortical VaD37Neuropsychological profile6Safe but neutral
    Exercise
    Aerobic danceADTSVD83 cSVD110Cognition, mood, mobility6Inconsistent benefits on memory and executive function
    Multi-domain
    Nurse-led multidimensional cardiovascular interventionpreDIVA84 Age 70–78 years3526Dementia and disability, WMH80Neutral on all outcomes. Cluster design, 116 practices
    • AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADAS-cog, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; ADCS-CGIC, Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change; BBB, blood-brain barrier; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy; CASI, Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument; CBF, cerebral blood flow; CIBIC-plus, Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus caregiver input; cSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; DSST, digit symbol substitution test; FU, follow-up; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; IS, ischaemic stroke; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MRI-BOLD, MRI blood oxygenation level dependent; PDE3-I, phosphodiesterase-3 inhibition; PDE5-I, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SBP, systolic BP; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; VADAS-cog, Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; WMD, white matter disease; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.

  • Table 2

    Trials with clinical and imaging outcomes: comparing numbers screened, randomised, centres, recruitment rates, completeness of follow-up

    PROGRESSVITATOPSSPRINT/SPRINT MINDPROSPERPROFESSACCORD/ACCORD MINDLACI-1
    ClinicalImagingClinicalImagingClinicalImagingClinicalImagingClinicalImagingClinicalImagingClinicalImaging
    Screened7121323N/AN/A14 692126723 7701100N/AN/A19 716N/AN/AN/A
    Randomised610525481644719361673580464620 333105710 2516325727
    Follow-up complete6102 (99.9%)192 (75.6%)7462 (91.4%)359
    (76.2%)
    8563 (91.5%)454 (67.5%)5147 (88.7%)554 (85.8%)20 208 (99.4%)771 (72.9%)10 201 (99.5%)503 (79.6%)56 (98.3%)22 (81.5%)
    Centres172101235101731695?772821
    Recruitment rate1.180.850.553.773.313.43113.8380.86?3.690.811.671.59
    Follow-up duration46.83640.82539.16.538.4333027.9423533
    Age (mean)6460.862.664.367.967.375.47566.265.462.262.466.168
  • Table 3

    Proportion and prediction of missing data for clinical outcomes assessed at 12 months in the LACI-2 trial based on key baseline variables

    OutcomeParticipants where outcome is missing (%)Baseline predictors as covariates in models to predict missingness
    AgeBaseline
    MoCA
    SexPrestroke mRSNIHSSTime to randomisationEducation
    Cog 7 Level55 (15.15%)*−0.038
    (0.018)
    −0.185 (<0.0001)0.721 (0.064)*Overall (0.006)−0.258 (0.057)0.0002 (0.208)Overall
    (0.257)
    Cog 4 Level55 (15.15%)*−0.040
    (0.018)
    −0.185 (<0.0001)0.721
    (0.064)
    *Overall (0.006)−0.258 (0.057)0.0002 (0.208)Overall
    (0.257)
    Modified Rankin Scale40 (11.02%)*−0.036 (0.045)−0.010 (0.849)0.021 (0.958)Overall (0.083)−0.187 (0.008)−0.001 (0.272)*Overall (0.015)
    t-MoCA56 (15.43%)*0.036 (0.023)*0.187 (<0.0001)−0.585 (0.123)*Overall (0.017)0.188 (0.145)−0.0004 0.168)Overall (0.364)
    TICS-m50 (13.77%)*0.041 (0.012)*0.205 (<0.0001)−0.547 (0.166)*Overall (0.036)0.343 (0.018)0.0002 (0.669)Overall (0.536)
    Verbal fluency test44 (12.12%)−0.033 (0.056)−0.189 (0.0001)0.495 (0.226)Overall (0.051)*−0.313 (0.036)−0.0001 (0.762)Overall (0.620)
    Trail Making Test B†207 (57.02%)0.003 (0.821)0.0001 (0.999)−0.099 (0.684)Overall (0.164)0.137 (0.136)0.0002 (0.506)Overall (0.146)
    Zung depression scale46 (12.67%)*−0.034
    (0.040)
    −0.063 (0.206)−0.017 (0.963)Overall (0.087)−0.190 (0.159)−0.0004 (0.378)Overall (0.092)
    Care home placement‡42 (11.57%)*−0.043 (0.013)−0.035 (0.506)0.098 (0.802)Overall (0.067)−0.175 (0.212)−0.0006 (0.250)*Overall
    (0.031)
    IQCODE§205 (56.47%)*−0.023 (0.041)0.002 (0.958)0.115 (0.634)Overall (0.116)0.097 (0.280)−0.0006 (0.019)Overall (0.693)
    EQ-5D-5L¶43 (11.85%)*−0.045 (0.010)−0.055 (0.289)−0.005 (0.990)Overall (0.093)−0.166 (0.227)−0.0004 (0.380)*Overall (0.034)
    EQVAS¶43 (11.85%)*−0.045
    (0.010)
    −0.055 (0.289)−0.005 (0.990)Overall
    (0.093)
    −0.166 (0.227)−0.0004 (0.380)*Overall (0.034)
    • Each row corresponds to a model using column variables as predictors.

    • Systolic BP and smoking did not predict missing variables (data not shown).

    • *estimate (p value)*=overall significant predictor variable.

    • †Required in-person assessment; many participants were unable to attend for assessment due to COVID-19 regulations.

    • ‡Disposition that is, place of residence, at 12 months. A: home independent—267, H: home with carer—49, R: residential home—1, died—4, missing and null—11+35=46–4=42.

    • §IQCODE: information collected from a person who knows the participant well; 213 participants did not provide informant details at randomisation, 7 participants had IQCODE but no informant recorded, 1 participant had informant but IQCODE not computed due to missing values.

    • ¶EQ-5D-5L and EQVAS—measures of quality of life.

    • DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 9 Issue 6 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 9 (6)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Design of trials in lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease: review and experience with the LACunar Intervention Trial 2 (LACI-2)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Design of trials in lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease: review and experience with the LACunar Intervention Trial 2 (LACI-2)
Gordon Blair, Jason P Appleton, Iris Mhlanga, Lisa J Woodhouse, Fergus Doubal, Philip M Bath, Joanna M Wardlaw
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 581-594; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-003022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Design of trials in lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease: review and experience with the LACunar Intervention Trial 2 (LACI-2)
Gordon Blair, Jason P Appleton, Iris Mhlanga, Lisa J Woodhouse, Fergus Doubal, Philip M Bath, Joanna M Wardlaw
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 581-594; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-003022
Download PDF

Share
Design of trials in lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease: review and experience with the LACunar Intervention Trial 2 (LACI-2)
Gordon Blair, Jason P Appleton, Iris Mhlanga, Lisa J Woodhouse, Fergus Doubal, Philip M Bath, Joanna M Wardlaw
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2024, 9 (6) 581-594; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-003022
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Ethics statements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Anti-stroke biologics: from recombinant proteins to stem cells and organoids
  • Central post-stroke pain: advances in clinical and preclinical research
Show more Review

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association