Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Is tenecteplase ready to replace alteplase to treat acute ischaemic stroke? The knowns and unknowns

Yi Dong, Yi Sui, Xin Cheng, David Z Wang
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001321 Published 25 February 2022
Yi Dong
1 Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yi Dong
Yi Sui
2 Department of Neurology, Shenyang Brain Hospital, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China
3 Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Shenyang, Shenyang, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yi Sui
Xin Cheng
1 Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xin Cheng
David Z Wang
4 Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Table 1

    Ongoing and planned clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of TNK

    Trial TypeTrial NameObjectivesStudy designPrimary outcomeKey safety outcomeKey eligibility criteriaRegistration
    number
    Within 4.5 hours of onsetAcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke)To test the real-world non-inferiority of TNK efficacy compared with tPA in patients with AIS eligible for IV thrombolysisTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs tPA 0.9 mg/kg non-inferiority
    Pragmatic registry-based
    phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=1600
    mRS at day 90–120Mortality and sICHPatients with AIS eligible for IV tPA or bridging therapyNCT03889249
    ATTEST 2 (Alteplase-Tenecteplase Trial Evaluation for Stroke Thrombolysis)To test the superiority of TNK efficacy compared with tPA in patients with AIS eligible for IV thrombolysisTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs tPA 0.9 mg/kg
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=1870
    mRS at day 90Intracranial and extracranial haemorrhage, mortality, neurological deterioration≥18 years old
    Thrombolysis initiated within 4.5 hours after onset
    Eligible for IV thrombolysis
    Premorbid mRS 0–1
    NCT02814409
    NOR TEST 2 (The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial 2)To compare efficacy and safety of TNK vs tPA 0.9 mg/kg within 4.5 hours after onset, including wake-up stroke and before EVTTNK 0.4 mg/kg vs tPA 0.9 mg/kg non-inferiority
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=1342
    % of mRS 0–1 at day 90Cerebral haemorrhages on CT/MRI within 24–48 hours and mortality≥18 years old
    Thrombolysis initiated within 4.5 hours after onset
    NIHSS >5
    Premorbid mRS 0–2
    NCT03854500
    Large vessel occlusionBRETIS-TNK (Boosting REcanalization of Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke by Intra-arterial TNK)To explore whether a combination of IA TNK and EVT can increase recanalisation rate after the first attempt of device passIA TNK 4 mg bolus followed by infiltration (0.4 mg/min) for 30 min
    Single arm
    phase: Not applicable
    N=30
    % of TICI 2b-3sICH≥18 years old
    LVO anterior circulation stroke eligible for EVT
    TOAST: LAA
    NCT04202458
    TASTE (Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Stroke Thrombolysis Evaluation)To test TNK’s efficacy in patients with demonstrated LVO and target penumbral pattern as opposed to tPA within 4.5 hoursTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs tPA 0.9 mg/kg non-inferiority
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=1024
    mRS 0–1 at day 90sICH and all cause death≥18 years old
    Thrombolysis initiated within 4.5 hours after onset
    Eligible for IV thrombolysis
    Premorbid mRS 0–1
    Imaging selection criteria:
    Penumbra volume >15 mL; mismatch ratio >1.8; ischaemic core <70 mL; severely hypoperfused volume <100 mL
    ACTRN12613000243718
    TEMPO 2 (TNK–Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Evaluation for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion)To test TNK’s efficacy compared with standard care, in patients of TIA or minor stroke with demonstrated LVO or near occlusion within 12 hoursTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs antiplatelets
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=1274
    mRS at day 90Major bleeding≥18 years old
    Treatment can be initiated within 12 hours after onset, and within 90 min of the start of CT/MRI
    TIA or minor stroke with NIHSS ≤5
    Acute LVO or near occlusion (TICI 0 or 1)
    Premorbid mRS 0–2
    NCT02398656
    Late time window or wake-up strokesCHABLIS-T (CHinese Acute Tissue-Based Imaging Selection for Lysis In Stroke -Tenecteplase)Optimal dosage determination of TNK in AIS patients in extended time window.TNK 0.25 mg/kg vs TNK 0.32 mg/kg
    Phase II
    randomisation: Yes
    Open-label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=86
    For patients w/o EVT:>50% reperfusion at 4–6 hours and w/o sICH at 24–48 hours
    For patients with EVT: mTICI score ≥2b before EVT and w/o sICH at 24–48 hours
    ICH, systemic bleeding and mRS 5–6≥18 years old
    4.5–24 hours after onset
    Anterior circulation AIS
    Premorbid mRS 0–2
    Clinically significant neurological deficits
    Imaging selection criteria: Proven LVO or severe stenosis; mismatch ratio >1.2; ischaemic core <70 mL; absolute difference >10 mL
    NCT04086147
    ETERNAL-LVO (Extending the Time Window for Tenecteplase by Effective Reperfusion in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion)To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TNK in extended time windowTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs standard care (may include eligible IV tPA)
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=740
    mRS 0–1 or return to baseline mRS (if premorbid mRS=2) at day 90ICH, all cause death, infarct growth, mRS 5–6≥18 years
    Up to 24 hours after onset or last known well
    Anterior circulation AIS
    Premorbid mRS 0–2
    Imaging selection criteria: Proven LVO or extracranial ICA stenosis; mismatch ratio >1.8; ischaemic core <70 mL; absolute difference >20 mL
    NCT04454788
    ROSE-TNK (MRI-guided thrOmbolysis for Stroke bEyond Time Window by TNK)To examine the feasibility and outcome of TNK in 4.5–24 hours after stroke guided by a mismatch between DWI and FLAIRTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs standard care
    Phase IV
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=80
    mRS 0–1 at day 90ICH, any bleeding events and death18–80 years old
    4.5–24 hours after onset
    NIHSS 6–25, or NIHSS ≤5 with culprit vessel occlusion or severe stenosis
    Premorbid mRS 0–1
    Imaging selection criteria: DWI infarct <1/3 of MCA or 1/2 of ACA or 1/2 of PCA territory; infarct <70 mL; DWI/FLAIR mismatch
    NCT04752631
    TIMELESS (Thrombolysis in Imaging-Eligible, Late-Window Patients to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase)To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TNK in extended time windowTNK 0.25 mg/kg vs placebo
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Blinded treatment: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=456
    mRS at day 90ICH, adverse events, mortality≥18 years old
    4.5–24 hours after onset
    Anterior circulation AIS
    Premorbid mRS 0–2
    NIHSS ≥5 prior to randomisation
    Imaging selection criteria: Proven LVO; mismatch ratio ≥1.8; Ischaemic core <70 mL; absolute difference ≥15 mL
    NCT03785678
    TWIST (Tenecteplase in Wake-Up Ischaemic Stroke Trial)18 To test TNK’s efficacy in stroke patients <4.5 hours of awakeningTNK 0.25 mg/kg+standard care vs no TNK +standard care
    Phase III
    randomisation: Yes
    Open label: Yes
    Blinded outcome assessment: Yes
    N=600
    mRS at day 90All-cause death and ICH≥18 years old
    Wake-up stroke
    With limb weakness with NIHSS of 3–24, or dysphasia
    Treatment can be initiated <4.5 hours of awakening
    NCT03181360
    • ACA, anterior cerebral artery; AIS, acute ischaemic stroke; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; EVT, endovascular therapy; FLAIR, fluid attenuation inversion recovery; IA, intra-arterial; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; IV, intravenous; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; LVO, large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; mTICI score, Modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia Score; sICH, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage; TNK, tenecteplase; TOAST, Trial of Org 10 172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator.;

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 7 Issue 1 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 7 (1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is tenecteplase ready to replace alteplase to treat acute ischaemic stroke? The knowns and unknowns
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Is tenecteplase ready to replace alteplase to treat acute ischaemic stroke? The knowns and unknowns
Yi Dong, Yi Sui, Xin Cheng, David Z Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2022, 7 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001321

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Is tenecteplase ready to replace alteplase to treat acute ischaemic stroke? The knowns and unknowns
Yi Dong, Yi Sui, Xin Cheng, David Z Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2022, 7 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001321
Download PDF

Share
Is tenecteplase ready to replace alteplase to treat acute ischaemic stroke? The knowns and unknowns
Yi Dong, Yi Sui, Xin Cheng, David Z Wang
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Feb 2022, 7 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001321
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Ethics statements
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Young stroke in Bangladesh: addressing rare cases with diagnostic challenges and much-needed solutions
  • Patient-reported outcome measure and its application in patients with stroke: item response theory
  • Should patients with minor strokes be given thrombolytics?
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association