Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Advanced Search

  • Online first
    • Online first
  • Current issue
    • Current issue
  • Archive
    • Archive
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Instructions for authors
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Instructions for authors
    • FAQs
    • Chinese Stroke Association
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Comparison of two bedside evaluation methods of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke

Ting Ye, Shengyan Huang, Yi Dong, Qiang Dong
DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000170 Published 21 December 2018
Ting Ye
1 Neurology Unit, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shengyan Huang
1 Neurology Unit, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Dong
1 Neurology Unit, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiang Dong
1 Neurology Unit, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The work flow of dysphagia evaluation in patients with acute stroke. V-VST, volume–viscosity swallow test. 

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    The comparison of levels of dysphagia recognised by V-VST and WST. All patients failed water test had a V-VST. Among them, 20 out of 79 were identified to have safe and effective swallowing capability. Twenty had only impaired swallowing safety and 10 had only impaired swallowing effectiveness. Patients with impaired safety or effectiveness received adjustment their food viscosity. Furthermore, all patients with unclear results on water test received a V-VST and their level of dysphagia were identified. V-VST, volume–viscosity swallow test; WST, water swallow test. 

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    The frequency of documented pneumonia and risk of pneumonia by stroke severity on screening. The screening frequency of documented pneumonia (solid line) and risk of pneumonia (dashed line) by stroke severity (only ischaemic stroke patients were included). Among them, 137 out of 230 patients had a pneumonia screening during their hospitalisation, and only 37 patients were diagnosed with CT scan or X-ray as having a pneumonia at discharge. The more severe the stroke, the higher the risk of pneumonia in these patients. However, the screening frequency of pneumonia also was increased due to the severity of stroke. 

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of patients with acute stroke who had WST and V-VST

    WST (n=276)V-VST (n=276) P values*
    Negative (n=197)Positive (n=71)Unclear (n=8)P valuesSafety and efficacy (n=217)Impaired function† (n=59)P values
    Age, years old, mean+SD61.23±13.9465.07±12.1765.38±16.650.09161.29±13.7566.22±12.650.0140.611
    Gender, males, %143 (72.59)50 (70.42)4 (50.0)0.375159 (73.27)38 (64.41)0.1820.626
    Onset to admission, days, mean+SD3.40±3.202.63±2.962.63±1.850.1193.40±3.282.37±2.300.0070.567
    LOS, days, mean+SD9.53±5.5912.79±9.3919.75±10.94<0.0019.54±5.4214.85±10.76<0.0010.441
    LOS in the ICU, days0.86±2.622.37±4.033.75±3.880.0010.98±2.872.63±3.830.0030.866
    Stroke subtype 0.7900.7430.849
     Intracranial haemorrhage (n, %)33 (16.75)11 (15.49)2 (25.0)37 (17.05)9 (15.25)
     Ischaemic stroke (n, %)164 (83.25)60 (84.51)6 (75.0)180 (82.95)50 (84.75)
    Baseline characteristics
     Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median+IQR151 (132-170)154 (137-165)156 (139-167)0.845151 (132-168)154 (139-166)0.2880.830
     Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median+IQR82 (74-92)84 (76-92)86 (75-97)0.82483 (75-93)82 (75-92)0.9370.660
    OCSP 0.0030.0020.470
     Lacuna (n, %)30 (15.23)3 (4.23)/33 (15.21)/
     Partial anterior circulation (n, %)110 (55.84)45 (60.38)6 (75.00)121 (55.76)40 (67.80)
     Posterior circulation (n, %)51 (25.89)13 (18.31)1 (12.50)53 (24.42)12 (20.34)
     Total anterior circulation (n, %)6 (3.05)10 (14.08)1 (12.50)10 (4.61)7 (11.86)
    Risk factors
     Atrial fibrillation (n, %)5 (2.54)8 (11.27)2 (25.00)0.0017 (3.23)8 (13.56)0.0020.876
     Diabetes mellitus (n, %)54 (27.41)22 (30.99)2 (25.00)0.83058 (26.73)20 (33.90)0.2780.661
     Hypertension (n, %)143 (72.59)55 (77.46)6 (75.00)0.723159 (73.27)45 (76.27)0.642
     Smoking (n, %)103 (52.28)32 (45.07)4 (50.00)0.581111 (51.15)28 (47.46)0.6150.862
    • ↵*The difference between the patients failed water test and the patients failed volume– viscosity test.

    • ↵†Impaired function in V-VST stands for impaired swallowing safety and/or effectiveness or failed to cooperate with the test.

    • ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; OCSP, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; V-VST, volume–viscosity swallow test; WST, water swallow test.

  • Table 2

    The comparison of different levels of dysphagia in stroke patients by WST and V-VST

    WST (n=79)V-VST
    (n=59)
    Level II (n=26)Level III-IV  (n=22)Level V (n=23)Unclear (n=8)P valuesOnly safety impaired (n=20)Only efficacy impaired (n=10)Safety and efficacy impaired (n=29)P values
    Age, years old, mean+SD63.69±11.4565.05±12.7266.70±12.7565.38±16.650.85667.25±11.2467.00±15.5465.14±12.840.076
    Gender, males, %18 (69.23)14 (63.64)18 (78.26)4 (50.00)0.47117 (85.00)5 (50.00)16 (55.17)0.058
    Onset to admission, days, mean+SD1.88±2.574.00±3.482.17±2.462.639.±1.850.0512.40±2.722.40±2.273.10±4.693.049
    LOS, days, mean+SD10.96±5.5510.23±3.7217.30±14.1619.75±10.940.00211.35±5.0519.50±19.3015.31±9.450.197
    LOS in the ICU, days2.92±4.881.43±2.812.65±4.053.75±3.880.2061.92±3.094.55±4.572.45±3.943.653
    Tube feeding3 (11.54)1 (4.55)14 (60.87)6 (75.00)<0.0014 (20.00)5 (50.00)15 (51.72)0.173
    Stroke subtype 0.6930.859
     Intracranial haemorrhage (n, %)5 (19.23)2 (9.09)4 (17.39)2 (25.00)3 (15.00)9 (90.00)5 (17.24)
     Ischaemic stroke (n, %)21 (80.77)20 (90.90)19 (82.61)6 (75.00)17 (85.00)1 (10.00)24 (82.76)
    OCSP 0.4390.120
     Lacuna (n, %)2 (7.69)1 (4.55)/////
     Partial anterior circulation (n, %)18 (69.23)14 (63.64)13 (56.52)6 (75.00)16 (80.00)6 (60.00)18 (62.07)
     Posterior circulation (n, %)1 (3.84)5 (22.73)7 (30.43)1 (12.50)2 (100.00)1 (10.00)9 (31.03)
     Total anterior circulation (n, %)5 (9.23)2 (9.09)3 (13.04)1 (12.50)2 (100.00)3 (30.00)2 (6.90)
    • ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; OCSP, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; V-VST, volume–viscosity swallow test; WST, water swallow test.

  • Table 3

    Baseline characteristics of patients with ischaemic stroke and haemorrhage stroke who did or did not have pneumonia

    DocumentedNo documented (n=113) P values*
    Negative (n=118)Positive (n=45)P values
    Age, years old, mean+SD61.81±13.8567.20±11.310.02160.96±13.970.640
    Gender, males, %90 (76.27)34 (75.56)73 (64.60)0.052
    Onset to admission, days, mean+SD3.22±3.232.58±2.730.2383.38±3.150.703
    LOS, days, mean+SD10.96±7.2512.82±11.210.2139.50±4.540.071
    LOS in the ICU, days1.47±3.982.32±3.210.2010.80±1.810.079
    Tube feeding10 (8.47)9 (20.0)0.0406 (5.31)0.344
    Stroke subtype 0.6940.616
     Intracranial haemorrhage (n, %)18 (15.25)8 (17.78)20 (17.70)
     Ischaemic stroke (n, %)100 (84.75)37 (82.22)93 (82.30)
    Baseline characteristics
     Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median+IQR152(138-166)157(139-178)0.218147(127-168)0.092
     Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg, median+IQR86(78-93)85(76-91)0.69583(73-92)0.098
    OCSP 0.229
     Lacuna (n, %)15 (12.71)3 (6.67)15 (13.27)
     Partial anterior circulation (n, %)63 (53.39)28 (62.22)70 (61.95)
     Posterior circulation (n, %)32 (27.12)8 (17.78)25 (22.12)
     Total anterior circulation (n, %)8 (6.78)6 (13.33)3 (2.65)
    Risk factors
     Atrial fibrillation (n, %)5 (4.24)4 (8.89)0.2456 (5.31)0.702
     Diabetes mellitus (n, %)27 (22.88)16 (35.56)0.10135 (30.97)0.165
     Hypertension (n, %)88 (74.58)33 (73.33)0.87183 (73.45)0.845
     Smoking (n, %)69 (58.47)27 (60.0)0.86043 (83.05)0.002
    Outcome of WST 0.0010.088
     Negative84 (71.18)19 (42.22)94 (83.19)
     Positive30 (25.42)25 (55.56)16 (14.16)
     Unclear4 (3.39)1 (2.22)3 (2.65)
    Outcome of V-VST <0.0010.039
     Safety and efficacy94 (79.66)24 (53.33)99 (87.61)
     Only safety impaired12 (10.17)4 (8.89)4 (3.54)
     Only efficacy impaired/7 (15.56)3 (2.65)
     Safety and efficacy impaired12 (10.17)10 (22.22)7 (6.19)
    • ↵*The difference between the patients with pneumonia and those without documentation

    • ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay; OCSP, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project; V-VST, volume–viscosity swallow test; WST, water swallow test.

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary file 1

    [SP1.pdf]

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 3 Issue 4 Table of Contents
Stroke and Vascular Neurology: 3 (4)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke and Vascular Neurology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of two bedside evaluation methods of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke and Vascular Neurology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke and Vascular Neurology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Comparison of two bedside evaluation methods of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke
Ting Ye, Shengyan Huang, Yi Dong, Qiang Dong
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2018, 3 (4) 237-244; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000170

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Comparison of two bedside evaluation methods of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke
Ting Ye, Shengyan Huang, Yi Dong, Qiang Dong
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2018, 3 (4) 237-244; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000170
Download PDF

Share
Comparison of two bedside evaluation methods of dysphagia in patients with acute stroke
Ting Ye, Shengyan Huang, Yi Dong, Qiang Dong
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Dec 2018, 3 (4) 237-244; DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000170
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio is a potential predictor of poor outcome in patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
  • Flow diversion covering the M1 origin as a last resort
  • Shenzhen stroke emergency map improves access to rt-PA for patients with acute ischaemic stroke
Show more Original article

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Chinese Stroke Association

AUTHORS

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

© 2025 Chinese Stroke Association