Table 4

Mediation analysis of hsCRP in the association between MetS and aICAS in the total sample and the subgroup

GroupTotal effectIndirect effectDirect effectProportion mediated, %
Coefficient (95% CI)P valueCoefficient (95% CI)P valueCoefficient (95% CI)P value
The entire cohort*0.030 (0.007–0.050)0.0120.002 (−0.000–0.010)0.1260.027 (0.005–0.050)0.0248.10%
≤65 s†0.029 (0.007–0.050)0.0160.004 (0.000–0.010)0.0440.026 (0.003–0.050)0.02612.10%
>65 s‡0.053 (−0.057–0.160)0.380−0.001 (−0.014–0.010)0.8400.054 (−0.053–0.160)0.3601.30%
  • The relationship between MetS (X) and hsCRP (Y): multivariable-adjusted linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between MetS and hsCRP in the overall sample (β=0.45, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.59, p<0.001) and the ≤65 years subgroup (β=0.59, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.73, p<0.001). No significant association was observed in the >65 years subgroup in the univariable linear regression model (β=0.27, 95% CI: −0.18–0.72, p=0.249).

  • *The entire cohort: adjusted for sex, age, coronary artery heart disease, MHR and NLR.

  • †The subgroup aged ≤65 years: adjusted for sex and coronary artery heart disease.

  • ‡The subgroup aged >65 years: adjusted for sex and MHR.

  • aICAS, asymptomatic intracranial arterial stenos; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C reactive protein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; MHR, monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio.