Table 2

HRs of dual antiplatelet therapy compared single antiplatelet therapy according to the analytical methods used in patients with standard duration

CrudeAdjusted*IPTWPSM
HR (95% CI)P value†HR (95% CI)P value†HR (95% CI)P value‡HR (95% CI)P value§
Primary outcome
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.77 (0.56~1.05)0.090.62 (0.41~0.93)0.020.66 (0.46~0.94)0.020.47 (0.27~0.82)0.008
Secondary outcome
 Ischaemic stroke
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.74 (0.53~1.04)0.090.57 (0.37~0.88)0.010.64 (0.43~0.94)0.020.39 (0.21~0.72)0.003
 TIA
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.93 (0.32~2.69)0.891.3 (0.21~7.97)0.770.67 (0.2~2.18)0.501.5 (0.25~9.0)0.66
Safety outcome
 Severe bleeding
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.62 (0.06~6.84)0.6911.61 (0~Inf)1.00
 All ICH
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.47 (0.23~0.93)0.030.75 (0.28~2.0)0.560.62 (0.28~1.38)0.240.43 (0.11~1.65)0.22
Any bleeding
 DAPT (vs SAPT)0.92 (0.66~1.3)0.650.84 (0.53~1.33)0.451.01 (0.7~1.48)0.940.89 (0.5~1.56)0.68
  • *Adjusted for the variables listed in table 1.

  • †Conventional Cox proportional hazards models.

  • ‡Weighted Cox proportional hazards models.

  • §Cox proportional hazards models within matched pairs.

  • DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; PSM, propensity score matching; SAPT, single antiplatelet therapy; s-ICH, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage; TIA, transient ischaemic attack.