Table 2

Summary of results from five randomised trials of PFO closure

Trial (year)NPFO closure device (incidence rate)Medical therapy (incidence rate)HR (95% CI)P values
CLOSURE-1 (2012)909STARFlex (2.6)AP/AC (3.1)0.78 (0.45 to 1.35)0.37
PC Trial (2013)414Amplatzer (0.8)AP/AC (1.3)0.63 (0.24 to 1.62)0.34
RESPECT (long term) (2017)980Amplatzer (0.6)AP/AC (1.1)0.55 (0.31 to 1.0)0.046
CLOSE (2017)473Multiple (0.0)AP/AC (1.2)0.03 (0.00 to 6.18)<0.001
REDUCE (2017)664Gore HELEX or CARDIOFORM (0.4)AP (1.7)0.23 (0.09 to 0.62)0.002
  • Incidence rate indicates the trial’s primary endpoint rate per 100 person-years.

  • AC, anticoagulant; AP, antiplatelet; PFO, patent foramen ovale; RESPECT, Randomized Evaluation of Recurrent Stroke Comparing PFO Closure to Established Current Standard of Care Treatment; PC, Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Embolism Trial.