Sex differences in the epidemiology of spontaneous and traumatic cervical artery dissections
============================================================================================

* Elke Schipani
* Kim J Griffin
* Carlee I Oakley
* Zafer Keser

## Abstract

**Background** Recent studies show cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is equally common between sexes, and that the incidence of CeAD has risen at a greater rate in females than males. In this population-based study, we identify sex differences in patients diagnosed with spontaneous and traumatic CeAD.

**Methods** 144 patients with spontaneous or traumatic CeAD were studied for sex differences in medical comorbidities, presenting symptoms and outcomes.

**Results** Females were more likely to carry a diagnosis of migraine, while males were more likely to have hyperlipidaemia. Females were more likely to present with neck pain, males with stroke. Females were significantly more likely to develop recurrent dissections in the study period.

**Conclusions** These findings underscore the importance of understanding CeAD through the lens of sex differences and may explain the significant rise in the diagnosis of CeAD in females. These findings support the importance of considering sex-specific risk factors and medical comorbidities with sex predilection in the diagnosis and management of CeAD. Furthermore, it emphasises the importance of female patients understanding risk factors and presenting signs that should prompt evaluation for CeAD.

*   Dissection
*   Ischemic Attack, Transient
*   Ischemic Stroke
*   Stroke

Recent epidemiology studies have shown that cervical artery dissection (CeAD), previously thought to have male predominance, is equally common across the sexes.1 Furthermore, over the last several decades, the incidence of CeAD has risen at a greater rate in females than males.2 Despite these changes, sex differences in CeAD epidemiology have not been reevaluated. In this population-based study, we sought to identify sex differences in the epidemiology, presentation and natural history of patients diagnosed with spontaneous and traumatic CeAD in Olmsted County, seen at a single centre with a high likelihood of complete case ascertainment, from the years 2002 to 2020.2

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 144 patients were included in the study, the findings which are detailed in table 1. Sixty-eight patients were female (47.2%); 76 patients were male (52.8%). There was no significant difference in age at dissection between females (47.3 years) and males (52.5 years, p=0.0605). There was no sex difference in the aetiology or vessel of dissection.

View this table:
[Table 1](http://svn.bmj.com/content/early/2024/09/11/svn-2024-003282/T1)

Table 1 
Sex differences in the epidemiology of spontaneous and traumatic cervical artery dissections, Olmsted County, 2002–2020

Evaluating medical comorbidities revealed several sex differences. Females were significantly more likely to carry a diagnosis of migraine (55.9% in females vs 15.8% in males, p<0.001), while males were significantly more likely to have hyperlipidaemia (43.4% in males vs 26.5% in females, p=0.034). There were no differences in other baseline characteristics evaluated.

Individuals were incidentally found to have CeADs without symptoms at equal rates. Females were significantly more likely to present with neck pain (39.7% vs 21.1% in males, p=0.015), while presenting symptoms of headache, Horner’s syndrome, and pulsatile tinnitus were not different between sexes. While there was no sex predilection for patients presenting with symptoms of stroke lasting less than 24 hours (transient ischemic attack, TIA, symptoms), males were more likely to present with clinical or imaging findings consistent with stroke (57.9% of males compared with 26.5% of females, p=0.049), and females were more likely to develop recurrent dissections in the intervening observation period (11.8% vs 1.3%, p=0.013). There was no significant sex difference between acute therapy (thrombolysis, p=0.370; thrombectomy, p=0.498 or hyperacute stenting, p=0.498), rates of endovascular intervention (p=0.463) or initial antithrombotic choice (p=0.066). Regarding long-term therapy, females were more likely to be prescribed aspirin >81 mg/day (22.1% vs 5.3% in males) and males more likely to be prescribed aspirin 81 mg/per day (73.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.010). There was no difference in functional outcome at 2 years.

The findings of this study underscore the importance of understanding the natural history of CeAD through the lens of sex differences and may explain the significant rise in the diagnosis of CeAD in female patients over the last several decades.2 Previous studies have suggested a younger age of females with CeAD and a male predilection towards traumatic dissection, both of which were not replicated in the current findings.1 3 4 It is possible that increased accessibility to vascular imaging over time has led to the diagnosis of dissections that may have been misdiagnosed as migraine or neck pain in the past, knowing that pain is evaluated and treated differently based on sex, and often gender, biases.5

Additionally, ischaemic stroke was more common in males. The exact underlying mechanism is not clear, but factors such as a higher burden of vascular risk factors and/or certain dissection features may contribute to a higher risk of ischaemic stroke in males. Although our study failed to show a significant difference in the morphology of dissection potentially due to small sample size, there was a trend towards more pseudoaneurysm formation (outward growth) in females versus stenosis or occlusion (inward growth) in males. This finding is consistent with previous studies showing a higher incidence of aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm in females, and female sex as an independent risk factor for aneurysm growth.6–8 We speculate that dissection morphology contributes to a higher ischaemic event rate in males and more common pain-predominant presentation in females, but further mechanistic studies are needed to validate this hypothesis. While the currently available imaging makes further characterisation of dissection size and morphology challenging, the development of techniques such as high-resolution photon CT angiogram may facilitate these investigations in the future.9

It is important for providers to consider sex-specific risk factors, such as pregnancy and oral contraceptive use in the approach to patient who may have CeAD. Pregnancy and the postpartum period have been shown to increase the risk of CeAD more than fivefold,10 which may be due to hormonally influenced vascular changes, including arterial elasticity and increased wall stiffness11–13 and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,14 15 while recent data suggest combined oral contraceptive use may increase risk of CeAD by influencing vascular tone and contributing to arterial stiffness.16–19 Similarly, medical comorbidities with sex predilection shown to be independent risk factors for spontaneous CeAD, such as fibromuscular dysplasia (higher prevalence in females) and migraine (twofold to threefold more prevalent in females) should be considered.10 20–22 Unfortunately, little is understood about outcomes stratified by these risk factors at this time.

Females undergo chiropractic manipulation more than males, which should be considered when facing a female patient with symptoms concerning for CeAD.1 Understanding sex-specific risk factors highlights the tendency to evaluate individuals with vascular risk factors (ie, hyperlipidaemia, more common in males) for vascular aetiologies of their symptoms and signs, versus deferring further investigation in those with comorbidities either less traditionally associated with stroke or mimickers of its presentation (ie, migraine, more common in females).4 Interestingly, a systematic review of risk factors for CeAD showed that traditional vascular risk factors were less likely to be associated with CeAD than non-CeAD ischaemic stroke, while migraine has demonstrated a strong association in both non-CeAD ischaemic stroke and healthy controls.23 Differences in practice based on sex-based norms may lead to underdiagnosis and, therefore, under-representation of females with CeAD. Our findings also highlight the sex-dependent risk of CeAD recurrence in females, which may impact decisions regarding follow-up and prevention strategy.

Although our study has the strength of complete case ascertainment, inclusion of just one centre and county in the USA with notably high rates of non-Hispanic whites is a limitation for generalisability to more diverse populations.2 The small sample size is another limitation, which did not allow for a thorough investigation of underlying mechanisms of sex differences and antithrombotic treatment decisions, which should be the focus of future investigation.

As important as it is for clinicians to understand the role of sex in the presentation and natural history of CeAD to provide the best care, it is also important for female patients to understand risk factors and presenting signs that should prompt evaluation for CeAD, particularly sex-predominant symptoms that have not traditionally been identified in the media as cause for urgent neurologic evaluation, such as pain. Efforts to raise awareness regarding CeAD in females are paramount.

## Ethics statements

### Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

### Ethics approval

This study involves human participants but Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, Rochester MN; IRB #21-012367; exempted, 28 December 2021 due to minimal risk of studying epidemiology retrospectively for the purposes of quality improvement. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

## Footnotes

*   X @ElkeSchipani, @zaferkeserMD

*   Contributors All authors contributed to study conceptualisation, data collection, analysis and drafting of the manuscript.

*   Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

*   Competing interests None declared.

*   Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

## References

1.  Metso AJ, Metso TM, Debette S, et al. Gender and cervical artery dissection. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:594–602. [doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03586.x](http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03586.x)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03586.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22150935&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

2.  Griffin KJ, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar J, et al. Epidemiology of Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: Population-Based Study. Stroke 2024;55:670–7. [doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043647](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043647)
    
    

3.  Sethi RKV, Kozin ED, Fagenholz PJ, et al. Epidemiological survey of head and neck injuries and trauma in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151:776–84. [doi:10.1177/0194599814546112](http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599814546112)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0194599814546112&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25139950&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

4.  Arnold M, Kappeler L, Georgiadis D, et al. Gender differences in spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology (ECronicon) 2006;67:1050–2. [doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000237341.30854.6a](http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000237341.30854.6a)
    
    

5.  Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, et al. “Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Res Manag 2018;2018:6358624. [doi:10.1155/2018/6358624](http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6358624)
    
    

6.  Fuentes AM, Stone McGuire L, Amin-Hanjani S. Sex Differences in Cerebral Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke 2022;53:624–33. [doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037147](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037147)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037147&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

7.  Juvela S, Poussa K, Porras M. Factors affecting formation and growth of intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke 2001;32:485–91. [doi:10.1161/01.str.32.2.485](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.2.485)
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjMyLzIvNDg1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NDU6Ii9zdm5ibWovZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOS8xMS9zdm4tMjAyNC0wMDMyODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

8.  Seven NA, Casanegra AI, Lanzino G, et al. Extracranial Internal Carotid and Vertebral Dissecting Pseudoaneurysms: Clinical Features and Long‐Term Outcomes. SVIN 2023;3:e000703. [doi:10.1161/SVIN.122.000703](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.122.000703)
    
    

9.  Keser Z, Diehn FE, Lanzino G. Photon-Counting Detector CT Angiography in Cervical Artery Dissection. Stroke 2024;55:e48–9. [doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.046174](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.046174)
    
    

10. Salehi Omran S, Parikh NS, Poisson S, et al. Association between Pregnancy and Cervical Artery Dissection. Ann Neurol 2020;88:596–602. [doi:10.1002/ana.25813](http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25813)
    
    

11. Kärkkäinen H, Saarelainen H, Valtonen P, et al. Carotid artery elasticity decreases during pregnancy - the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:98. [doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-98](http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-98)
    
    

12. Yuan LJ, Xue D, Duan YY, et al. Maternal carotid remodeling and increased carotid arterial stiffness in normal late-gestational pregnancy as assessed by radio-frequency ultrasound technique. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:122. [doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-122](http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-122)
    
    

13. Calvet D, Boutouyrie P, Touze E, et al. Increased stiffness of the carotid wall material in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2004;35:2078–82. [doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000136721.95301.8d](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000136721.95301.8d)
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjM1LzkvMjA3OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjQ1OiIvc3ZuYm1qL2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDkvMTEvc3ZuLTIwMjQtMDAzMjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

14. Robb AO, Mills NL, Din JN, et al. Influence of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and preeclampsia on arterial stiffness. Hypertension 2009;53:952–8. [doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130898](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130898)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130898&link_type=DOI) 

15. Abdelnour LH, Kurdy M, Idris A. Systematic review of postpartum and pregnancy-related cervical artery dissection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:10287–95. [doi:10.1080/14767058.2022.2122799](http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2122799)
    
    

16. Talarowska P, Dobrowolski P, Klisiewicz A, et al. High incidence and clinical characteristics of fibromuscular dysplasia in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissection: The ARCADIA-POL study. Vasc Med 2019;24:112–9. [doi:10.1177/1358863X18811596](http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X18811596)
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

17. Del Zotto E, Grassi M, Zedde M, et al. Risk Profile of Patients with Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection. Ann Neurol 2023;94:585–95. [doi:10.1002/ana.26717](http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.26717)
    
    

18. Kadian-Dodov D, Gornik HL, Gu X, et al. Dissection and Aneurysm in Patients With Fibromuscular Dysplasia: Findings From the U.S. Registry for FMD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:176–85. [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.044](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.044)
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo0OiJhY2NqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY4LzIvMTc2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NDU6Ii9zdm5ibWovZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wOS8xMS9zdm4tMjAyNC0wMDMyODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

19. Orshal JM, Khalil RA. Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004;286:R233–49. [doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00338.2003](http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00338.2003)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1152/ajpregu.00338.2003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14707008&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000187791500001&link_type=ISI) 

20. Bonacina S, Grassi M, Zedde M, et al. Clinical Features of Patients With Cervical Artery Dissection and Fibromuscular Dysplasia. Stroke 2021;52:821–9. [doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031579](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031579)
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

21. Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA. Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:76–87. [doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30293-9](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30293-9)
    
    [CrossRef](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30293-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsvnbmj%2Fearly%2F2024%2F09%2F11%2Fsvn-2024-003282.atom) 

22. Rana MN, Al-Kindi SG. Prevalence and manifestations of diagnosed fibromuscular dysplasia by sex and race: Analysis of >4500 FMD cases in the United States. Heart Lung 2021;50:168–73. [doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.022](http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.022)
    
    

23. Rubinstein SM, Peerdeman SM, van Tulder MW, et al. A systematic review of the risk factors for cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2005;36:1575–80. [doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000169919.73219.30](http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000169919.73219.30)
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://svn.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjM2LzcvMTU3NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjQ1OiIvc3ZuYm1qL2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDkvMTEvc3ZuLTIwMjQtMDAzMjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)